【24h】

Performance Comparison and Analysis of Typical Energy Conversion Cycle

机译:典型能量转换周期的性能比较与分析

获取原文

摘要

The performance of 3 types of energy utilization cycles including the organic Rankine cycle, the single stage static hydrogen compression cycle, and the new multistage continuous hydrogen compression cycle were analyzed. Amulti-element valued model was used to evaluate the performance holistically, and the result showed that the integrated superiority achieved 0.721, which indicated the continuous hydrogen compression cycle is considered the best option among the typical compression energy utilization cycles and deserves thorough studying.
机译:分析了有机朗肯循环,单级静态氢压缩循环和新型多级连续氢压缩循环这三种类型的能量利用循环的性能。采用多元评价模型对性能进行整体评价,结果表明综合优势达到0.721,表明连续氢压缩循环被认为是典型压缩能量利用循环中的最佳选择,值得深入研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号