首页> 外文会议>2011 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium >Integration of capacity factors analysis risk methodology and Ostrom's social ecological system assessment framework to assess and improve domestic water infrastructure in Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India
【24h】

Integration of capacity factors analysis risk methodology and Ostrom's social ecological system assessment framework to assess and improve domestic water infrastructure in Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India

机译:整合能力因素分析风险方法和Ostrom的社会生态系统评估框架,以评估和改善印度安得拉邦纳尔贡达区的生活用水基础设施

获取原文

摘要

Over the past 50 years, both financing and socio-economic considerations in South India have shifted heavily towards improving urban infrastructure, causing rural services to be left behind. A recent report released by WHO and UNICEF states that over 884 million people, 84% of whom live in rural areas, use “unimproved water sources” for domestic purposes. This paper considers the case study of Nalgonda, a district to the east of Hyderabad, India. Nalgonda struggles with three main issues concerning domestic water: high fluoride levels in groundwater have caused thousands of cases of dental and skeletal fluorosis; second, over two-thirds of Nalgonda does not meet the WHO-requirement of 40 liters per capita daily of domestic water supply; third, poor management and maintenance have increased the risk of failure of existing water infrastructure. The state has been pursuing these issues in conjunction with a multi-district irrigation project that taps the regional Nagarjuna Sagar Dam. Centralized water supply, treatment, and distribution services are appropriate for high population density areas; however, geographical expanse and sparse populations lead to onerous access to improved water sources and inhibit the success of a similar centralized framework in rural areas. This is compounded by a lack of ownership at the habitation and socio-cultural levels. Further, the current water network and its problems — including inconsistent service, corruption, and general distrust of the treated Sagar water — have emboldened wealthier citizens to build private, unregulated groundwater defluoridation plants and commercialize small-scale water businesses. Inequitable services and uncertainty of shared water resources have caused a “tragedy of the commons,” leading to growing disparity and a severely receding water table. This research proposes the Louis-Ostrom Comprehensive Capacity Assessment (LOCCA) tool — an integration of-- the quantitative Capacity Factors Analysis risk methodology and the qualitative Ostrom''s framework for assessing socio-ecological systems (SESs). The new framework is used to provide a sample assessment of the Vaillapally habitation in Narayanpur Mandal, Nalgonda. Preliminary results indicate that the institutional, technical, and socio-cultural capacity factors must progress to meet the policymakers'' current projects technical capacity. Alternatively, decentralized systems, such as rainwater harvesting technology, better serve rural areas with low capacity and demand, while increasing collective investment in village-scale systems.
机译:在过去的50年中,印度南部的融资和社会经济考虑都越来越朝着改善城市基础设施,导致农村服务留下。世卫组织和儿童基金会发布的最近报告称,超过8.84亿人,其中84%的人住在农村地区,为国内目的使用“未经改善的水源”。本文考虑了印度海德拉巴东部Nalgonda的案例研究。 Nalgonda与有关国内水的三个主要问题斗争:地下水的高氟化物水平造成数千例牙科和骨骼氟中毒;其次,超过三分之二的Nalgonda并不符合每天供水每人40升的世卫组织要求;第三,管理和维护差增加了现有水基础设施失效的风险。该州一直与多区灌溉项目一起追求这些问题,该项目可以轻拍地区Nagarjuna Sagar大坝。集中供水,处理和分配服务适用于高人口密度区域;然而,地理扩张和稀疏的人口导致繁重的进入改善的水源,并抑制农村地区类似集中框架的成功。这通过缺乏居住和社会文化层面缺乏所有权。此外,目前的水网络及其问题 - 包括对治疗的Sagar水的不一致服务,腐败和一般不信任 - 已经凭借富裕的富裕的公民来建立私人,不受管地的地下水偏外植物,并将小型水企业商业化。共用水资源的不公平的服务和不确定性导致了“公共悲剧”,导致差距和严重后退的水位。这项研究提出了路易斯 - 奥斯特罗姆综合能量评估(Locca)工具 - 一体化 - - 定量容量因素分析风险方法与定性奥斯特罗姆评估社会生态系统(Sess)的框架。新框架用于提供Narayanpur Mandal,Nalgonda的Vaillapally居住的样本评估。初步结果表明,制度,技术和社会文化能力因素必须取得进展,以满足政策制定者的目前的项目能力。或者,分散系统,如雨水收获技术,更好地为农村地区提供低容量和需求,同时越来越多的村庄规模系统投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号