• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>2011 International Summer Conference of Asia Pacific on Business Innovation and Technology Management >A comparison of local community sustainability of livelihood: A case study in Redang and Tioman Islands, Malaysia
【24h】

A comparison of local community sustainability of livelihood: A case study in Redang and Tioman Islands, Malaysia

机译：当地社区生计可持续性的比较：马来西亚热浪岛和刁曼群岛的案例研究

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In order to conserve and protect marine life, the Government of Malaysia has gazetted a total of 40 islands as marine parks. All activities that disrupt the stability of the marine eco-system are prohibited. This includes fishing which is the main occupation of communities on these islands. This policy had negatively affected the livelihood of the communities. This research analyzes and compares the case of communities of Pulau Tioman (TIMP) and Pulau Redang Marine Parks (PRMP). The analysis on livelihood sustainability is based on the perceptions of locals after the islands have been gazetted as marine parks. The five standard of living indicators which are human, physical, natural/environment, social, finance as well as threats/ uncertainties towards socio-economic changes were analyzed. The results show that in general, both the livelihood of both communities are satisfied in terms of human, physical and social assets. However, they lack satisfaction on the financial and natural/environmental aspects. The education element also needs to be addressed as there are still school dropouts among the children of these island communities. Nonetheless, the locals are still safe from socio-economic threats/uncertainties and disease outbreaks/disasters. In comparing the RIMP and TIMP, it is found that the TIMP community has better sustainable livelihood than that of the RIMP locals.
机译：为了养护和保护海洋生物，马来西亚政府已在宪报刊登了总共40个岛屿作为海洋公园。禁止进行任何破坏海洋生态系统稳定性的活动。这包括捕鱼，这是这些岛屿上社区的主要职业。这项政策对社区的生计产生了不利影响。这项研究分析和比较了刁曼岛（TIMP）和热浪岛海洋公园（PRMP）社区的情况。对生计可持续性的分析是基于将这些岛屿列为海洋公园之后当地人的看法。分析了五个生活指标，即人类，自然，自然/环境，社会，财务以及对社会经济变化的威胁/不确定性。结果表明，总体而言，两个社区的生计在人力，物质和社会资产方面都得到了满足。但是，他们对财务和自然/环境方面不满意。这些岛屿社区的儿童中仍有辍学现象，因此也需要解决教育方面的问题。尽管如此，当地人仍然不受社会经济威胁/不确定性和疾病暴发/灾难的影响。在比较RIMP和TIMP时，发现TIMP社区比RIMP当地人具有更好的可持续生计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号