• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Air and Waste Management Association annual conference and exhibition >The Impact of the Upcoming Boiler MACT Rules at Three Distilled Spirits Manufacturing Facilities - A Lesson in Strategic Planning
【24h】

The Impact of the Upcoming Boiler MACT Rules at Three Distilled Spirits Manufacturing Facilities - A Lesson in Strategic Planning

机译：即将到来的锅炉MACT规则对三个蒸馏酒生产设施的影响-战略规划中的一课

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On February 21, 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) finalized1 two regulations (40 CFR Part 63 Subpart DDDDD -Major Source Boiler MACT and 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart JJJJJJ - Area Source Boiler MACT) that will have a dramatic effect on reducing emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from certain combustion operations located at a wide variety of industrial, commercial and institutional sources. For affected facilities, these rules will also significantly increase the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting burden for plant personnel. These rules replace the original Boiler MACT rule, which was promulgated in September 2004 and subsequently vacated by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in June 2007, a scant three months before the compliance date for the original rule. In addition, another version of the Boiler MACT rules, proposed on April 29, 2010, was met with such discord from both Congress and industry, that USEPA reduced both the applicability and scope of the final rule. Beam Global Spirits & Wine, Inc. (Beam) operates three distilled spirit manufacturing operations in Kentucky, two of which had already taken steps towards compliance with the original Boiler MACT rule. These two facilities utilize coal, natural gas and propane for combustion operations. The third Beam facility, which was not affected by the original Boiler MACT rule, uses natural gas and fuel oil for its combustion operations. Thus, the differences in fuel use at these facilities and their prior efforts to comply with the original Boiler MACT rule provides a dynamic case study to compare and contrast alternative Boiler MACT compliance strategies. This paper will provide an overview of the three Beam facilities, briefly describe the history of the Boiler MACT rules and examines the potential impact that the February 21, 2011 rules will have on three different distilled spirit manufacturing facilities. In addition, the presentation will discuss the strategic planning process that each facility has undertaken as it heads towards compliance with the Boiler MACT rules.
机译：2011年2月21日，美国环境保护局（USEPA）最终敲定了两项法规（40 CFR第63部分DDDDD-主要源锅炉MACT和40 CFR第63部分JJJJJJ-区域源锅炉MACT）。减少来自各种工业，商业和机构来源的某些燃烧操作产生的有害空气污染物（HAP）的排放。对于受影响的设施，这些规则还将显着增加工厂人员的监视，记录保存和报告负担。这些规则取代了最初的锅炉MACT规则，该规则于2004年9月颁布，随后于2007年6月由华盛顿特区巡回上诉法院撤销，距离原始规则的遵守日期仅三个月之遥。此外，2010年4月29日提出的另一版《锅炉MACT规则》遭到了国会和行业的不满，美国环保局同时降低了最终规则的适用性和范围。 Beam Global Spirits＆Wine，Inc.（Beam）在肯塔基州拥有3家蒸馏酒制造厂，其中2家已采取步骤以符合最初的锅炉MACT规则。这两个设施利用煤，天然气和丙烷进行燃烧操作。 Beam的第三家工厂不受原始的MACT锅炉规则的影响，其燃烧操作使用天然气和燃料油。因此，这些设施的燃料使用差异以及他们为遵守原始锅炉MACT规则所做的先前努力提供了一个动态案例研究，以比较和对比替代锅炉MACT遵守策略。本文将概述这三种Beam设备，简要描述锅炉MACT规则的历史，并研究2011年2月21日规则对三种不同蒸馏酒生产设备的潜在影响。此外，演讲将讨论每个设施在遵循锅炉MACT规则时所进行的战略规划过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号