• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Pipeline conference;Pipelines 2011 >How to Fund Pipeline Renewal: Transitioning from O M funds to Capital Improvement Budgets
【24h】

How to Fund Pipeline Renewal: Transitioning from O M funds to Capital Improvement Budgets

机译：如何为管道更新提供资金：从O＆M资金过渡到资本改善预算

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Municipalities have challenges funding both emergency and planned infrastructure repairs. Challenges come from time and value requirements predetermined for use of O&M funding, and time requirements needed to secure capital funding. O&M budgets are a great source of ready to go funds. Should an operations manager's organizational costs not be impacted by use of these funds for an emergency repair, then O&M funding may make sense for smaller projects. However, O&M funding value limitations will likely not support the higher costs associated with renewal projects. Although every agency differs, each agency has limitations for use of O&M dollars. For example, O&M funding may be limited to projects having a useful life of less than 5 years and project costs below $50,000. From this, it becomes obvious why O&M funding is a better fit to support maintenance operations rather than infrastructure renewals. The vast majority of infrastructure renewals exceed the time and value requirements set for use of O&M funding. As a result, Municipalities must obtain Capital funding to address both emergency and planned renewals. This paper discusses the ways in which municipal agencies have been able to successfully utilize capital improvement allocations for carbon fiber-reinforced-polymer (CFRP) renewal of pipelines by recognizing this technology as a long term method for asset management for renewal of both buried and above ground infrastructure. The methods discussed are prequalification of materials and installers, award of on-call contracts, and methods for projecting the costs of future renewals for long term budget allocations.
机译：市政当局面临着为紧急和计划中的基础设施维修提供资金的挑战。挑战来自为使用运维资金而预先确定的时间和价值要求，以及获得资本资金所需的时间要求。 O＆M预算是随时可以使用的资金的重要来源。如果运营经理的组织成本不受这些资金用于紧急维修的影响，则O＆M资金可能对较小的项目有意义。但是，O＆M资金价值的限制可能不会支持与更新项目相关的更高成本。尽管每个机构都不同，但是每个机构在使用O＆M美元方面都有局限性。例如，O＆M资金可能仅限于使用寿命少于5年且项目成本低于50,000美元的项目。由此可见，为什么运维资金更适合于支持维护运营而不是基础架构更新。绝大多数基础设施更新都超过了使用O＆M资金所设定的时间和价值要求。结果，市政当局必须获得资本资金，以应对紧急情况和计划中的更新。本文讨论了市政机构通过将这项技术识别为用于埋地及以上地区更新的资产管理的长期方法的成功方法，从而成功地将资本改进分配用于管道的碳纤维增强聚合物（CFRP）更新地面基础设施。讨论的方法是对材料和安装人员进行资格预审，授予待命合同以及为长期预算拨款预测未来续订成本的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号