• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Geo-Congress >Sustainability Assessment of Subtitle D Cover versus Biocover for Methane Oxidation at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
【24h】

Sustainability Assessment of Subtitle D Cover versus Biocover for Methane Oxidation at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

机译：字幕D封面与生物覆盖物在城市固体垃圾填埋场中甲烷氧化的可持续性评估

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A life cycle analysis (LCA) was conducted in this study to evaluate the sustainability of using two different widely adopted cover system designs, the Subtitle D cover and the biocover. The two cover systems were designed according to RCRA regulations using a field validated, California Landfill Methane Inventory Model (CALMIM). The cover systems were designed for an IEPA-listed, active landfill site (Countryside Landfill Inc.) located in the Chicago Metropolitan area. Environmental sustainability analysis for the two cover system designs was performed using SimaPro (Version 7). Economic and social sustainability analysis was methodically performed for both the cover systems. Overall, this study showed that the biocover system is a more sustainable option when compared to the Subtitle D cover system by accounting for sustainability metrics involving the environmental, social and economical aspects.
机译：在本研究中进行了生命周期分析（LCA），以评估使用两种不同广泛采用的覆盖系统设计，字幕D覆盖和生物的可持续性。使用加州垃圾填埋甲烷库存模型（Calvim），根据RCRA法规设计了两种覆盖系统。封面系统专为位于芝加哥大都市区的IEPA列出的有效垃圾填埋场（Countryside Landfill Inc.）。使用SimaPro（版本7）进行两个覆盖系统设计的环境可持续性分析。经济和社会可持续性分析对于覆盖系统有条不紊地进行。总的来说，该研究表明，与涉及环境，社会和经济方面的可持续性指标的可持续性指标与副标题D覆盖系统相比，生物植物系统是一种更可持续的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号