首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cyber Conflict >Suggestions to measure cyber power and proposed metrics for cyber warfare operations (cyberdeterrence/cyber power)
【24h】

Suggestions to measure cyber power and proposed metrics for cyber warfare operations (cyberdeterrence/cyber power)

机译:衡量网络力量的建议和网络战争行动的拟议指标(网络威慑/网络力量)

获取原文

摘要

How does one measure cyber power? Though there are many established methods for measuring power, none of these can be satisfactorily applied to the cyber domain, and these shortcomings were recognized two decades ago. "Traditional measures of military force, gross national product, population, energy, land, and minerals have continued to dominate discussions of the balance of power. These power resources still matter, and American leadership continues to depend on them as well as on the information edge... Information power is also hard to categorize because it cuts across all other military, economic, social, and political power resources, in some cases diminishing their strength, in others multiplying it ". (Nye and Owens, 1996, p.22). The author is also trying to determine the metrics of cyber operations, ie how does one measure success? The ability to measure and validate success is always a crucial metric in the performance of a task, and in this case the conduct of an Information Warfare (IW) campaigns is no different. This research analyses two approaches for the development of metrics in a Cyber environment: · A top-down approach with a strong feedback mechanism, one that allows actors to learn lessons from their actions and to apply changes to the system as deemed appropriate. · A more decentralised methodology, which embraced any and all IW standards. This bottom-up view utilises a more liberal process for collecting metrics that attempts to bring together disparate activities into a collective force. This paper will analyse the efforts of various IW initiatives by both sides, and attempt to determine the key factors of success.
机译:如何衡量网络功率?虽然有许多既定的测量方法,但这些方法都不能令人满意地应用于网络领域,并且这些缺点是二十年前认可的。 “军事力量,国家产品,人口,能源,土地和矿物质的传统措施继续占据权力平衡的讨论。这些电力资源仍然重要,美国领导力继续依赖于他们以及信息Edge ...信息电力也很难分类,因为它在某些情况下削减了所有其他军事,经济,社会和政治力量资源,在某些情况下减少了他们的实力,在其他情况下乘以它“。 (纽约和欧文斯,1996,第22页)。作者还试图确定网络运营的指标,即如何衡量成功?测量和验证成功的能力始终是一项任务表现的重要指标,在这种情况下,信息战(IW)活动的行为并非不同。该研究分析了网络环境中指标的两种方法:·具有强大反馈机制的自上而下的方法,允许演员从他们的行动中学习课程并将系统应用于适当的系统。 ·更分散的方法,它拥有任何和所有IW标准。此自下而上的视图利用更自由的过程来收集试图将不同活动聚集在一起的指标。本文将分析双方各种IW举措的努力,并试图确定成功的关键因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号