• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Construction research congress >Do Designers and Builders Share a Similar Understanding of Occupational Safety and Health Risks?
【24h】

Do Designers and Builders Share a Similar Understanding of Occupational Safety and Health Risks?

机译：设计者和建造者是否对职业安全和健康风险有相似的理解？

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A recognition grows that the root causes of occupational safety and health (OSH) incidents can be traced back to problems inherent in industry-level construction systems. Despite calls for the engagement of owners/clients, designers, and all contributors to construction projects in the OSH effort, high levels of technological, organizational, and cultural differentiation present a significant barrier to the integration of OSH into the currently fragmented construction systems. This paper reports an experimental study that investigates the extent to which different sociotechnical roles (i.e., designers and builders) share similar understanding of OSH risks. The experiment recruited 60 professional designers and builders with at least three years of practical experience in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. The participants were required to sort 32 photographs that represent varying means and methods of contraction based on their understandings of OSH risk probability. Data analysis reveals quantifiable evidence to the discordance of designers and builders' OSH risk likelihood perceptions. The findings contribute to identification of the underlying mechanisms by which occupants of disparate professional and functional roles form judgments of OSH risk and take actions based on these judgments.
机译：人们日益认识到，职业安全与卫生（OSH）事件的根本原因可以追溯到工业级建筑系统中固有的问题。尽管要求业主/客户，设计师和所有参与OSH工作的建筑项目参与者都参与其中，但高水平的技术，组织和文化差异仍然是将OSH集成到当前分散的建筑系统中的重大障碍。本文报告了一项实验研究，调查了不同的社会技术角色（即设计师和建筑商）对OSH风险具有相似理解的程度。该实验招募了60名在建筑，工程和建筑（AEC）行业中具有至少三年实践经验的专业设计师和建筑商。要求参与者根据对OSH风险概率的理解，对代表不同收缩方式和方法的32张照片进行分类。数据分析揭示了可量化的证据，证明了设计师和建筑商对职业安全与卫生风险可能性的看法不一致。这些发现有助于确定潜在的机制，通过这些机制，不同专业和职能角色的使用者可以形成职业安全与卫生风险的判断并根据这些判断采取行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号