首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference;International Association for Energy Economics >Effectiveness and Equity Comparison of Personal Carbon Trading and Carbon Tax in Private Transport: Based on a Driving Decision Model and a Case Study in China
【24h】

Effectiveness and Equity Comparison of Personal Carbon Trading and Carbon Tax in Private Transport: Based on a Driving Decision Model and a Case Study in China

机译:私人交通中个人碳交易和碳税的有效性和公平性比较:基于驱动决策模型和中国的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The private road transport sector is one of the major sources of CO_2 emissions. To control CO_2 emissions from private vehicles, two policy tools-a personal carbon tax and personal carbon trading in the transportation sector (TPCT for short)-have been discussed in many studies. In this paper, to compare the effectiveness and equity of these two instruments, a theoretical individual driving decision model is built, and two scenarios of carbon tax and TPCT are analyzed. The model proves that TPCT provides more incentive to reduce personal driving demands; however, a carbon tax can meet to the criteria of equity that TPCT may not. To test the theoretical model, a stated preference survey of 700 samples is conducted among Chinese city drivers. The survey results provide empirical support for the theoretical conclusions and verify the potential for changing driving behavior under different policies. Compared to a carbon tax, the TPCT policy leads to a greater reduction of CO_2 emissions in the private transport sector, taking equity as price, under current China's circumstances.
机译:私营公路运输部门是CO_2排放的主要来源之一。为了控制私人车辆的CO_2排放,许多研究都讨论了两种政策工具-个人碳税和交通运输部门的个人碳交易(简称TPCT)。在本文中,为了比较这两种工具的有效性和公平性,建立了理论上的个人驾驶决策模型,并分析了碳税和TPCT的两种情况。该模型证明,TPCT提供了更多的动机来减少个人驾驶需求;但是,碳税可以满足TPCT可能无法达到的公平标准。为了检验理论模型,对中国城市驾驶员进行了700种样本的陈述性偏好调查。调查结果为理论结论提供了经验支持,并验证了在不同政策下改变驾驶行为的潜力。与碳税相比,TCTP政策在当前中国的情况下,以公平为价格,大大减少了私营交通部门的CO_2排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号