首页> 外文会议>eceee summer study on energy efficiency;European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy >Help or hindrance? Does energy efficiency in general, and product policy specifically, even up income disparity or make it worse?
【24h】

Help or hindrance? Does energy efficiency in general, and product policy specifically, even up income disparity or make it worse?

机译:帮助还是阻碍?总体而言,能源效率,尤其是产品政策,是否会加剧收入差距或加剧差距?

获取原文

摘要

Recently, there has been an increasing focus on the wider impacts of energy efficiency policy - beyond reducing costs and carbon emissions. Amongst these impacts is the effect of energy efficiency (EE) policies on income distribution - do they help to reduce or widen the difference in incomes across the region’s population; that is, are they progressive or regressive within the region they are implemented?It is generally recognised that household income has an effect on how consumers use energy and how citizens respond to energy policy. For example, it is hypothesised that lower income groups are generally less able to access the benefits of EE, partly as a result of their lower ability to fund up-front costs of measures. This hypothesis has been tested by researchers for some climate change and EE policies using a variety of theoretical and empirical approaches, producing mixed results. Whilst some studies provide evidence to support the hypothesis, others have found evidence that EE policies focussed on lower income residents have reduced income inequality for targeted households, and some studies suggest that in some countries EE appliances do not in practice incur higher up-front costs and so may not incur distributional impacts.However, for product policy specifically (including minimum energy performance standards (MEPS), labels, grants), there appears to be a paucity of research using data to evaluate the impacts on income distribution. The few investigations of such impact that have been found tend to be theoretical and focus on implied consumer discount rates and MEPS.This paper synthesises the literature on the distributional impact of climate and EE policies. It examines the context for product policy, before examining the literature for product policy specifically. Based on this review, some initial product policy implications will be drawn. Finally, it assesses potential data sources that would enable additional research to better understanding distributional impacts of product policy.
机译:最近,人们越来越关注能效政策的更广泛影响-除了降低成本和碳排放量。这些影响包括能源效率(EE)政策对收入分配的影响-它们是否有助于减少或扩大该地区人口的收入差异;也就是说,它们在实施区域内是进步的还是回归的? 人们普遍认为,家庭收入对消费者如何使用能源以及公民对能源政策的反应有影响。例如,假设低收入群体通常无法获得EE的好处,部分原因是其为措施的前期成本提供资金的能力较低。研究人员使用多种理论和经验方法对这一假设进行了一些气候变化和EE政策的检验,得出了不同的结果。虽然一些研究提供了支持该假设的证据,但其他研究发现了证据表明,针对低收入居民的电子电气政策降低了目标家庭的收入不平等,一些研究表明,在某些国家,电子电气设备实际上并不会招致较高的前期成本。因此可能不会产生分配影响。 但是,对于具体的产品政策(包括最低能源绩效标准(MEPS),标签,补助金),似乎很少有研究使用数据来评估对收入分配的影响。已经发现的对这种影响的研究很少是理论上的,并且集中在隐含的消费者贴现率和最低能效标准上。 本文综合了有关气候和EE政策的分布影响的文献。它先检查产品政策的背景,然后再具体检查产品政策的文献。在此审查的基础上,将得出一些初步的产品政策含义。最后,它评估了潜在的数据源,这些数据源将有助于进行更多的研究,以更好地理解产品政策对分配的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号