A Research Framework of Conflict Complexity for Brownfield Redevelopment: A Social Network Perspective

机译：社会网络视角的布朗菲尔德重建冲突复杂性研究框架

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Game theory is commonly used in conflict research but few attentions were focused on conflict complexity from the perspective of stakeholders' social characteristics. This paper proposed a framework of conflict complexity with social network. The framework included two processes: 1) reviewing literature to establish a theoretical framework, and 2) employing the cases of brownfield redevelopment to demonstrate the feasibility. The results indicated the dynamic feature of social network structure as a consequence of the different roles of stakeholders, the influences of in-group preference as well as dissemination of information in the generation of conflict, and the scope and degree of conflict which were based on simulation analysis. The paper can fill the gap for improving the conflict governance in brownfield redevelopment.

机译：博弈论是冲突研究中常用的方法，但是从利益相关者的社会特征的角度来看，很少将注意力集中在冲突的复杂性上。本文提出了一种与社交网络冲突复杂性的框架。该框架包括两个过程：1）复习文献以建立理论框架，以及2）利用棕地再开发案例来证明可行性。结果表明，社会网络结构的动态特征是由于利益相关者角色的不同，群体内偏好的影响以及信息在冲突产生中的传播以及基于冲突的范围和程度的结果仿真分析。本文可以填补在棕地重建中改善冲突治理的空白。

著录项

来源
《International Conference on Management Science and Engineering》|2017年|263-268|共6页
会议地点
作者
Lin Hong-Li; Zhu Yu-Ming; Ahmad Naveed; Han Qing-Ye;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
Social network services; Stakeholders; Complexity theory; Analytical models; Games; Game theory; Buildings;

机译：社交网络服务;涉众;复杂性理论;分析模型;博弈;博弈论;建筑物;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Multi-Party Privacy Conflict Management in Online Social Networks: A Network Game Perspective [J] . Kemi Ding, Junshan Zhang IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking . 2020,第6期

机译：在线社交网络中的多方隐私冲突管理：网络游戏视角
2. Reflexive Capacity in Local Networks for Sustainable Development: Integrating Conflict and Understanding into a Multi-Level Perspective Transition Framework JEPP Reflexive Governance [J] . Gottschick Manuel Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning . 2018,第5a6期

机译：地方网络可持续发展的反思能力：将冲突和理解集成为多级视角过渡框架JPP反身份治理
3. Exploring the Effects of the Privacy-Handling Management Styles of Social Networking Sites on User Satisfaction: A Conflict Management Perspective [J] . Zhang Jie, Li Han, Luo Xin (Robert), Decision sciences . 2017,第5期

机译：探索社交网站的隐私处理管理样式对用户满意度的影响：冲突管理的观点
4. A Research Framework of Conflict Complexity for Brownfield Redevelopment: A Social Network Perspective [C] . Lin Hong-Li, Zhu Yu-Ming, Ahmad Naveed, International Conference on Management Science and Engineering . 2017

机译：布朗菲尔德重建冲突复杂性研究框架：社会网络视角
5. Two octopuses making love: An analysis of institutional management behaviors across four brownfield remediation and redevelopment project networks in Rochester and Buffalo, NY. [D] . Alexander, Rob. 2011

机译：两只章鱼做爱：纽约州罗切斯特和布法罗的四个棕地整治和再开发项目网络中的机构管理行为分析。
6. A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China [O] . Shinan Zhao, Haiyan Xu 2019

机译：基于图模型的新型偏好激发技术及其在中国棕地再开发冲突中的应用
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考
8. Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative: Proposal Guidelines for Brownfields Cleanup. [R] . 2001

机译：布朗菲尔德经济再开发计划：布朗菲尔德清理的提案指南。

A Research Framework of Conflict Complexity for Brownfield Redevelopment: A Social Network Perspective

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅