首页> 外文会议>ASME power conference >TECHNO-ECONOMIC COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND INNOVATIVE COMBINED SOLAR THERMAL POWER AND DESALINATION METHODS FOR COGENERATION
【24h】

TECHNO-ECONOMIC COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND INNOVATIVE COMBINED SOLAR THERMAL POWER AND DESALINATION METHODS FOR COGENERATION

机译:传统与创新相结合的太阳能热能与海水淡化方法之间的技术经济比较

获取原文

摘要

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has determined that solar power coupled desalination could be the next step in helping to resolve the water-energy nexus. For many decades, integration of concentrating solar power (CSP) electricity generation for combined power and water production has typically utilized the conventional method of steam Rankine cycles. Current research focuses on an enticing innovative method which combines CSP with Brayton cycles and uses supercritical CO_2 (sCO_2) as a working fluid, allowing for a broader temperature range. This techno-economic study analyzes the power and possible freshwater generation of each cycle and provides a comparison of the techno-economic advantages associated with each technology when applied to desalination processes. The results of this study suggest that recompression-closed Brayton (RCBR) cycle is likely to have the most significant impact in decreasing the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), almost halving it from combining CSP with the traditional Rankine cycle. Also, to minimize levelized cost of water (LCOW) a smaller scale desalination facility which utilizes multi-effect distillation with thermal vapor compression (MED/TVC) instead of multi-stage flash distillation (MSF) is most applicable. Although the lowest LCOE values are for wet-cooled RCBR with MSF and MED/TVC, in areas where freshwater generation is crucial to be optimized there is only a 0.04 cents/kWh increase for dry-cooled RCBR with MED/TVC to a cost of 9.8 cents/kWh. This suggests the best candidate for optimizing freshwater generation while minimizing both LCOW and LCOE is dry-cooled RCBR with MED/TVC desalination.
机译:美国能源部(DOE)已确定,太阳能耦合淡化可能是帮助解决水能关系的下一步。几十年来,将聚光太阳能发电(CSP)发电整合在一起以产生电力和水的组合生产,通常都采用了传统的蒸汽朗肯循环方法。当前的研究集中在一种诱人的创新方法上,该方法将CSP与布雷顿循环相结合,并使用超临界CO_2(sCO_2)作为工作流体,从而允许更宽的温度范围。这项技术经济研究分析了每个循环的动力和可能产生的淡水,并比较了每种技术应用于淡化工艺时与技术经济相关的优势。这项研究的结果表明,密闭式布雷顿(RCBR)循环可能对降低平准化电力成本(LCOE)产生最显着的影响,而将CSP与传统的兰金循环结合起来几乎减少了一半。同样,为了使水的平均成本(LCOW)最小化,最适合使用规模较小的海水淡化设施,该设施利用带热蒸气压缩的多效蒸馏(MED / TVC)代替多级闪蒸(MSF)。尽管最低的LCOE值是采用MSF和MED / TVC的湿冷RCBR,但在需要优化淡水发电的地区,采用MED / TVC的干冷RCBR的成本仅增加0.04美分/ kWh。 9.8美分/千瓦时。这表明在使LCOW和LCOE最小化的同时优化淡水产生的最佳候选者是采用MED / TVC脱盐的干冷RCBR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号