首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Human-Omputer Interaction;International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design >Designing Co-design: Addressing Five Critical Areas to Increase the Experience of Participants and Facilitator in a Co-design Session
【24h】

Designing Co-design: Addressing Five Critical Areas to Increase the Experience of Participants and Facilitator in a Co-design Session

机译:设计共同设计:解决五个关键领域,以增加共同设计会议中参与者和主持人的经验

获取原文

摘要

Background: In recent years, the practice of co-design has gained proper attention for it can provide innovative approaches to complex societal problems through the participation of all stakeholders. Usually, designers focus on arranging methods and tools to support participants' ideation and expression trying to overcome the barriers resulting from differences in background, skills, attitudes, and expertise (Sanders and Stappers 2012). However, acting as facilitators or team leaders without specific training on individual and group dynamics can lead to overlooking tacit or latent aspects that can eventually drag the team into tiresome quicksand during the sessions. Methods: interpretive concepts and theories describing individual transformation processes in the context of small groups are taken from relevant literature in the field of management development and applied psychology. Results: a light conceptual framework spots five critical areas that professional designers need to pay attention to when planning and conducting a co-design activity, if they want to keep the participation and involvement alive: (1) Motivation; (2) Focus; (3) Boundaries; (4) Rumination; (5) Transformation. Conclusion: An area for further research and theory ground for group-based co-design practice is outlined.
机译:背景:近年来,协同设计的实践得到了应有的重视,因为它可以通过所有利益相关者的参与为复杂的社会问题提供创新的方法。通常,设计师专注于安排方法和工具来支持参与者的想法和表达,以克服背景,技能,态度和专业知识的差异所导致的障碍(Sanders和Stappers 2012)。但是,如果在没有对个人和团队动态进行特定训练的情况下充当协调人或团队负责人,则可能会导致忽略默认或潜在方面,从而最终使团队在会议期间陷入疲惫的流沙之中。方法:从管理发展和应用心理学领域的相关文献中获取在小组环境下描述个体转型过程的解释性概念和理论。结果:一个轻巧的概念框架指出了专业设计师在计划和进行共同设计活动时,要保持参与和参与的活力,需要注意的五个关键领域:(1)动机; (2)重点; (3)边界; (四)反省; (5)转型。结论:概述了需要进一步研究的领域和基于小组的协同设计实践的理论基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号