• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>SME annual conference expo;CMA national western mining conference >EMINENT DOMAIN MINERAL PROPERTY VALUATIONS: WHEN SELF-PROCLAIMED 'LATITUDE' FALLS SOMEWHERE SOUTH OF COMPETENCE AND ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS
【24h】

EMINENT DOMAIN MINERAL PROPERTY VALUATIONS: WHEN SELF-PROCLAIMED 'LATITUDE' FALLS SOMEWHERE SOUTH OF COMPETENCE AND ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS

机译：杰出的矿产财产估价：当自称“纬度”下降时，胜任力和道德义务在南方

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Mineral property appraisers engaged in eminent domain actions on properties for which mining is the highest and best use must be fully competent in all phases of mineral resource estimation, mine project development, and mine operations (or retain the requisite competent assistance), as well as educated in eminent domain appraisal (USPAP Competency Rule). Failure to ensure such triggers the issue of appraisal competence and demonstrates a flagrant disregard of the myriad code(s) and guidelines to which the appraiser is subject. The cavalier assertion of some vague, undefined "latitude" in the valuation process does not exonerate the appraiser from a disregard of the USPAP Competency Rule. Lack of independence (i.e., "advocacy") in mineral property appraisal is the usual result of a weak background in mining and/or appraisal theory. While it is readily apparent to those able to recognize it in reports and testimony, judges and juries cannot be expected to detect or recognize purposefully misleading (or even fraudulent) valuation concepts or testimony. Purposeful deception by the appraiser can lead to specious over-compensation of the property owner (thus victimizing the taxpayer); or, a failure to provide appropriate and just compensation to the property owner - yet, the purpose of an eminent domain proceeding is to leave the property owner no richer or poorer as a result of the taking. This paper highlights some of the deceptive practices encountered in litigation settings and raises issues of competency, professional ethics, and the effectiveness of the inherent enforcement capabilities within those institutions awarding professional certifications.
机译：从事最高采矿活动的最佳领域的矿产财产评估师必须在矿产资源估算，矿山项目开发和矿山运营的所有阶段都完全胜任（或保留必要的胜任协助），以及受过杰出域名评估（USPAP能力规则）的教育。未能确保这样做会触发评估能力的问题，并表明公然无视评估人所遵循的众多准则和准则。评估过程中一些模糊，不确定的“自由度”的轻率断言不会使评估师免于无视USPAP能力规则。矿产评估中缺乏独立性（即“倡导”）是采矿和/或评估理论背景薄弱的通常结果。虽然对于那些能够在报告和证词中识别出来的人来说很明显，但是不能期望法官和陪审团有目的地发现或识别有误导性（甚至是欺诈性的）估值概念或证词。鉴定人故意欺骗可能导致财产所有人的过高补偿（从而使纳税人受害）;或未能向财产所有人提供适当和公正的赔偿-然而，杰出的域名程序的目的是使财产所有人不因被盗而富裕或贫穷。本文重点介绍了在诉讼环境中遇到的一些欺骗性做法，并提出了能力，职业道德以及那些获得专业证书的机构内部执行能力的有效性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号