• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>AIAA aviation forum >Modelling Head Injury due to Unmanned Aircraft Systems Collision: Crash Dummy vs Human Body
【24h】

Modelling Head Injury due to Unmanned Aircraft Systems Collision: Crash Dummy vs Human Body

机译：无人驾驶飞机系统碰撞造成的头部受伤建模：碰撞假人与人体

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent developments in the concept of UAS operations in urban areas have led to risk concerns of UAS collision with human. To better understand this risk, head and neck injuries due to UAS collisions have been investigated by different research teams using crash dummies. Because of the limitations in biofidelity of a crash dummy, head injury level for a crash dummy impact may differ from the human body impact. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to investigate differences in head and neck injuries subject to UAS collision with an often used crash dummy and a human body. To perform such investigation, multibody system (MBS) models have been used to simulate UAS impacts on validated models of the crash dummy and the human body. The findings confirm the moderate risks of head and neck injuries that have been reported. However, neck load differs significantly between the crash dummy model and the human body model, and the human body model sustains larger head injury but smaller neck injury compared to the crash dummy model.
机译：UAS在城市地区UAS业务概念的最新发展导致UAS与人类碰撞的风险问题。为了更好地理解这种风险，通过使用崩溃假人的不同研究团队调查了由于UAS碰撞而导致的头部和颈部受伤。由于崩溃假的生物能力的局限性，碰撞虚拟撞击的头部损伤水平可能与人体的影响不同。因此，本文的目的是调查患有UAS碰撞的头部和颈部损伤的差异与经常使用的崩溃假人和人体。为了执行此类调查，多体系系统（MBS）模型已被用于模拟UAS对碰撞虚拟和人体的验证模型的影响。调查结果证实了报告的头部和颈部受伤的适度风险。然而，颈部负荷在碰撞虚拟模型和人体模型之间显着不同，与碰撞虚拟模型相比，人体模型维持较大的头部损伤，但颈部损伤较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号