• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population;International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >Integrating Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS) into Healthcare Professional Practices: A Scoping Review
【24h】

Integrating Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS) into Healthcare Professional Practices: A Scoping Review

机译：将个人应急系统（PERS）集成到医疗保健专业实践中：范围界定审查

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Seeking effective approaches to integrate technology into formal healthcare professionals' daily works has been acknowledged as challenging. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent research concerning the implementation of personal emergency response systems (PERSs), with the focus on the routine use of PERS among formal healthcare professionals, as well as identify current gaps in this area. The scoping review followed the five-stage framework of Arksey and O'Malley and PRISMA-Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Web of Science Core Collection for studies published from 2009 to 2019. Any peer-reviewed studies in English describing strategies, barriers, and facilitators, or assessing the impact of integrating PERS into healthcare professional practices fulfilled the inclusion eligibility. Two reviewers screened the manuscripts and extracted data independently, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies. Due to a large heterogeneity of included studies, a narrative synthesis was conducted. In total, 25 studies were included out of 2,319 manuscripts. This study discusses supportive strategies, and enabling and inhibiting factors, as well as integration outcomes. Future studies can contribute to three gaps by examining: 1) how strategies such as training contribute to the effectiveness of technology integration separately and collectively; 2) how working environments affect the effectiveness of realizing operational works; and 3) how technology is shaped by social environments and relationships.
机译：寻求有效的方法来将技术整合到正式的医疗保健专业人员的日常工作中已被认为具有挑战性。本文的目的是提供有关个人应急系统（PERS）实施的最新研究的全面概述，重点是正规医疗保健专业人员对PERS的常规使用，并找出该领域当前的差距。范围界定审查遵循Arksey和O'Malley的五个阶段框架以及PRISMA-扩展范围审查（PRISMA-ScR）。搜索在PubMed，CINAHL，EMBASE和Web of Science核心收藏集中进行，以研究2009年至2019年发表的研究。任何经过英语同行评审的研究都描述了策略，障碍和促进者，或者评估了将PERS纳入医疗保健专业人员的影响实践满足了纳入资格。两名审稿人筛选了稿件并独立提取了数据，第三名审稿人解决了差异。由于所纳入研究的异质性很大，因此进行了叙事综合。总共有25项研究被纳入2,319篇手稿中。这项研究讨论了支持策略，启用和抑制因素以及整合结果。未来的研究可以通过检查以下三个方面来弥补：1）培训等策略如何分别和集体地促进技术集成的有效性; 2）工作环境如何影响实现作业的有效性; 3）社会环境和人际关系如何塑造技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号