首页> 外文会议>ASIS annual meeting >AN INVESTIGATION INTO SELF-QUESTIONING BEHAVIOR DURING PROBLEM-SOLVING
【24h】

AN INVESTIGATION INTO SELF-QUESTIONING BEHAVIOR DURING PROBLEM-SOLVING

机译:解决问题解决期间自我质疑行为的调查

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this research was to investigate self-questioning behavior within the context of a problem-solving situation in order to better understand the user's handling of his/her information need. An experiment was designed to yield data to test the hypothesis that problem-solving activity is reflected as successful and unsuccessful questioning behavior. Two different behaviors in questioning emerged to support the hypothesis. The basic underlying assumptions for this study are that question generation arises from an information need and that questioning is a behavioral act to satisfy that need. The specific hypothesis is: Self-questioning behavior in a problem situation reveals successful and unsuccessful problem-solving strategies. Corollary is: Solvers and non-solvers exhibit differing self-questioning strategies. This investigation found information need to be different for solvers and non-solvers and that this difference was revealed through self-questioning strategies. The findings clearly delineated between solvers and non-solvers. Conventional statistical treatment of the scores on the number of questions generated supported the assumption of equal means: a surface or first level effect as it turned out to be. The correlation treatment, however, was able to demonstrate two different behaviors specifically lexical from the syntax: a second level effect. These specific question formulations when treated semantically through content analysis revealed underlying differences in the questioning strategies: a third level effect.
机译:本研究的目的是在解决问题的情况下调查自我质疑行为,以便更好地了解用户对其信息的处理需求的处理。设计实验以产生数据以测试问题解决活动被反映为成功和不成功的质疑行为的假设。在疑问中出现了两种不同的行为来支持假设。本研究的基本基础假设是问题生成从信息需求中产生,并且质疑是一种满足需求的行为行为。具体假设是:问题情况下的自我质疑行为揭示了解决问题的解决方案策略。推论是:求解器和非溶剂表现出不同的自我质询策略。本调查发现信息需要对求解器和非求解器不同,并且通过自我质疑策略揭示了这种差异。在溶剂和非溶剂之间清楚地描绘的结果。在产生的问题数量上的常规统计治疗支持等于等于的假设:表面或第一级效果。然而,相关处理能够从语法中具体描述的两个不同的行为:第二级效应。通过内容分析进行语义治疗时的这些特定的问题配方揭示了质疑策略的潜在差异:第三级效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号