• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Annual Frontiers in Education Conference >A return to collegiality in criteria 2000 visits
【24h】

A return to collegiality in criteria 2000 visits

机译：2000年访问中的返回合约性

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Engineering Criteria 2000 require open and clear exchange between ABET evaluators and the administrators and program faculty seeking evaluation. The Criteria encourage innovations in both programs and leadership by providing the opportunity andresponsibility for defining unique program objectives. Under Engineering Criteria 2000, evaluators are charged to accept these program-specific objectives and to determine whether programs meet their stated goals, a process quite different from theapplication of pre-determined criteria. This new accreditation process necessitates enhanced communication between program representatives and evaluators.This paper provides a view of the evaluation process from several perspectives. A new Electromechanical Engineering program, evaluated in the fall of 1998, is the focus of several points of view: the chairperson of the program, program faculty, programstudents, and an EAC evaluator. The effect of Criteria 2000 on program processes, the steps required for visit preparation and for the visit itself and the post-visit effects of constructive feedback from ABET evaluators are detailed. The ways in whichnovel programs are fostered and encouraged by Criteria 2000 receives particular emphasis. Program administrator, evaluator, faculty and student perspectives of the accreditation process experience are illustrated. While new program evaluations areespecially challenging for all concerned, evaluator and program participants alike can find Criteria 2000 evaluations opportunities for discovering ways to improve engineering education.
机译：2000年工程标准需要在儿童评估员和管理员和程序学院寻求评估之间开放和清除交换。标准通过为定义独特的计划目标提供机会，鼓励方案和领导中的创新。在2000年的工程标准下，评估人员被收取接受这些具体目标的目标，并确定方案是否符合其规定的目标，与预先确定标准的挖掘方式完全不同。这种新的认证过程需要增加方案代表和评估人员之间的沟通。本文从几个角度提供了评估过程的视图。一项新的机电工程计划在1998年秋季评估，是若干观点的重点：计划，计划教师，程序化和EAC评估员的主席。 2000年标准对方案流程的影响，参观准备所需的步骤以及访问自身的访问以及从ABET评估人员的建设性反馈的后访问​​后效果。通过标准2000年促进和鼓励其中的方式获得特别强调。说明了认证过程经验的计划管理员，评估员，教师和学生视角。虽然新的计划评估对于所有有关的人来说都是挑战，但评估者和计划参与者可以找到2000年评估机会来发现改善工程教育的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号