• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Software Measurement >Field Study: Influence of Different Specification Formats on the Use Case Point Method
【24h】

Field Study: Influence of Different Specification Formats on the Use Case Point Method

机译：实地研究：不同规格格式对用例点法的影响

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Use Case Point method (UCP method) allows early, easy estimation of the anticipated effort during a software development project. The basis for such estimation in real industrial projects is commonly a number of rough specifications in different formats and of differing granularity. The success of the UCP method and comparability of the results depend above all on whether and how good use cases can be identified and weighted from the specifications. Within a field study, a total number of more than 200 UCP estimations based on eight different specification formats have been performed. The estimations have been compared quantitatively and qualitatively with regard to the reproducibility of effort estimation and with regard to expert valuations. With the help of statistical methods a mean variance (variation coefficient) between 13% and 48% was found depending on the specification format. Thus, a valuation of specification formats for improving estimation accuracy could be derived with the help of variance analysis.
机译：使用情况点点方法（UCP方法）允许早期，轻松估计在软件开发项目中的预期工作。实际工业项目此类估计的基础通常是一种以不同格式和不同粒度的粗略规范。 UCP方法的成功和结果的可比性依赖于是否可以从规范中识别和加权使用良好的使用情况。在实地研究中，已经执行了基于八种不同规范格式的200多个UCP估计总数。在努力估算的再现性和关于专家估值方面，定量和定性地进行了比较了估计。在统计方法的帮助下，根据规范格式，发现了13％和48％的平均方差（变化系数）。因此，可以在方差分析的帮助下导出用于提高估计准确度的规范格式的估值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号