首页> 外文会议>Conference on Finance and Accounting >Valuation Date in the Process of MA
【24h】

Valuation Date in the Process of MA

机译:估值日期在并购过程中

获取原文

摘要

Valuation for M&A and other transactions is peculiar topic. Quite often it's the business valuation translated into compensation that causes the discontent of the leaving shareholders and it is the valuation analysis that is opposed and becomes a subject of litigation at court. The value drivers like earnings, profit margin or discount rate are usually discussed. Another important variable - the valuation date - may stay unchallenged. Even though it may seem rather a technical matter only, the task to choose a proper valuation date is a cornerstone of every valuation analysis. The facts presented in this paper suggests that the choice of the valuation date is not solely formal, legal issue, but it obviously has a material impact to the rights of individuals, i.e. owners of companies, and also to the financial statements of the companies involved. It is therefore not correct to talk about the well known value drives and leave the valuation date in the background. In fact, it's exactly the opposite - the date of valuation determines the value drivers, and also fixes the premises and circumstances, regardless of whether the appraiser decides to use valuation models based on market comparison, DCF or asset-based models.
机译:对并购和其他交易的估值是特殊的话题。通常,这是商业估值转化为赔偿,导致离开股东的不满,而是反对的估值分析,并成为法院诉讼的主题。通常讨论价值司机,盈利,利润率或折扣率。另一个重要变量 - 估值日期 - 可以保持不良。尽管它似乎相当是技术问题,但选择适当估值日期的任务是每个估值分析的基石。本文提出的事实表明,估值日期的选择并非正常,法律问题,但它显然对个人的权利,即公司所有者的权利,以及所涉及的公司的财务报表。 。因此,讨论众所周知的价值驱动器并留下估值日期是不正确的。事实上,它正是相反的 - 估值日期决定了价值驱动因素,并且还要修复房屋和情况,而不管评估师是否决定使用基于市场比较,DCF或基于资产的估值模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号