• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the American^Wood^Protection^Association >Performance of Non-traditional Coated Products Against Fungal and Termite Attack Under Sub-tropical Conditions
【24h】

Performance of Non-traditional Coated Products Against Fungal and Termite Attack Under Sub-tropical Conditions

机译：在亚热带条件下对真菌和白蚁攻击进行非传统涂层产品的性能

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A variety of alternative, non-biocidal wood treatments have recently entered the market as alternatives to traditional preservative treated wood. However, there is little public comparative data on the performance of these newer systems. In this report, we describe decay and termite tests of several products including Timbersil, Eco Red Shield, and BluWood in comparison with non-treated Douglas-fir lumber as well as wood treated with copper azole. Termite tests indicated that Eco Red Shield and BluWood provided little protection against formosan termites, while Timbersil performed well but not as well as copper azole treated wood. Decay tests are still in the early stages, but decay has begun to develop on wood treated with either Eco Red Shield orBluWood. The results suggest that caution should be exercised when contemplating the use of these products in areas with high termite pressure or where wetting can occur.
机译：最近将市场进入了各种替代的非杀药木治疗作为传统防腐剂处理木材的替代品。 但是，有关这些较新系统性能的公众比较数据很少。 在本报告中，我们描述了几种产品的腐烂和白蚁测试，包括Timbersil，Eco Red Shield和Bluwood，与未处理的Douglas-FiR木材以及用铜唑烷处理的木材进行比较。 白蚁测试表明生态红盾和布鲁伍德对Formosan白蚁提供了很少的保护，而Timbersil表现良好，但不适用铜唑.奥唑处理的木材。 衰变测试仍处于早期阶段，但衰减已经开始在用生态红盾orbluwood处理的木材上开发。 结果表明，应在考虑在具有高白蚁压力的区域或可能发生润湿的地方使用这些产品时谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号