• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Educational Management and Administration >DISSECTING HUMOR ON DAVID SEDARIS' ME TALK PRETTY ONE DAY BY APPLYING GENERAL THEORY OF VERBAL HUMOR
【24h】

DISSECTING HUMOR ON DAVID SEDARIS' ME TALK PRETTY ONE DAY BY APPLYING GENERAL THEORY OF VERBAL HUMOR

机译：解剖幽默在David Sedaris上，我通过应用口头幽默的一般理论，一天漂亮的一天

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Understanding and perceiving humor in narrative text is not unproblematic. This is not only we have to know the background knowledge of the humor but also understanding the structure of humor in narrative text. As the winner of the Thurber Prize for American Humor at 2001, David Sedaris 'Me Talk Pretty One Day must be very funny. However, a humor can never achieve its intended effect unless the basic elements of the humor are completely self-evident. So this study is endeavored to know (1) the parts of text in David Sedaris 'Me Talk Pretty One Day that is humorous, and (2) how David Sedaris delivers the humor in this his autobiography. The research is done by descriptive qualitative. Seven very funny chapters of 27 chapters in David Sedaris' Me Talk Pretty One Day then are analyzed by Miles-Huberman's data reduction, data display and conclusion. In the data reduction, there are the narrative leveling and the selection-description of the data in terms of GTVH knowledge resources. The text is levelled into narrative level/storyline (leveln), micronarrative level (leveln-n), and metanarrative level (leveln>n). The GTVH knowledge resources applied are script opposition (SO), logical mechanism (LM), situation (SI), target (TA), narrative strategy (NS), and language (LA). The data then displayed in such a matrices so that the conclusion can be drawn. From the seven chapters analyzed, it is found that 457 parts of text are humorous (457 script oppositions). The type of script opposition are normal/abnormal (68.05%), Good vs. bad (13.57%), Obscene vs. non-obscene (5.25%), Possible vs. impossible (4.16%), Correct/incorrect (2.63%), Real vs. unreal (2.41%), clear/unclear (1.53%), Honest/dishonest (1.53%), Crime/non-crime (0.44%), realistic/unrealistic (0.22%). serous/unserious (0.22%). Those script oppositions are presented various logical mechanism. They are ignoring the obvious (18.16%), analogy (13.79%), juxtaposition (12.47%), parallelism (11.38%), inferring consequence (6.56%), potency mappings (6.35%), faulty reasoning (5.47%), exaggeration (5.25%), vacuous reversal (3.28%), Coincidence (3.28%), role-reversals (2.63%), self-undermining (2.63%), almost situation (2.41%), vicious circle (1.97%), garden-path (0.88%), implicit parallelism (0.88%), proportion (0.44%), field restriction (0.44%), false analogy(0.44%), cratylism (0.44%), referential ambiguity (0.44%), role exchanges (0.22%), and figure-ground reversal (0.22%). The humor are delivered through diffuse disjunction 59.74%, ending with punch line (28%), using metanarrative disruption (8%), and coincidences (3.7%). From the findings, it can be concluded that David Sedaris' Me Talk Pretty One Day is funny. However, as it is dominated by normal/abnormal opposition and delivered through diffuse disjunction, readers of David Sedaris' Me Talk Pretty One Day may find difficulties in perceiving the humor, especially non-native speaker.
机译：理解和感知叙述文本的幽默并不是毫无疑问。这不仅要知道幽默的背景知识，还要了解叙事文本的幽默结构。作为2001年美国幽默的Thurber奖的获奖者，David Sedaris'e Me Talk漂亮有一天一定非常有趣。然而，除非幽默的基本要素完全不言而喻，否则幽默永远不会实现其预期的效果。因此，这项研究致力于知道（1）大卫塞塔利斯的文本的部分们的聊天漂亮的一天幽默，并且（2）大卫塞塔利斯如何在这方面发表幽默。该研究是通过描述性定性完成的。七章在大卫塞塔利斯27章的七章漂亮的章节漂亮有一天，然后通过Miles-Huberman的数据减少，数据显示和结论分析。在数据减少中，就GTVH知识资源而言，存在叙述级别和数据的选择描述。该文本升级为叙述级别/故事情节（leveln），微缩级别（leveln-n）和MetanArrative级别（leveln> n）。应用的GTVH知识资源是脚本反对（SO），逻辑机制（LM），情况（SI），目标（TA），叙述策略（NS）和语言（LA）。然后数据在这样的矩阵中显示，以便可以绘制结论。从分析的七章中，发现457份文本是幽默的（457个脚本反对派）。反对派的类型是正常/异常（68.05％），好与坏（13.57％），淫秽与非淫秽（5.25％），可能与不可能（4.16％），正确/不正确（2.63％） ，真正的VS.虚幻（2.41％），清除/不清楚（1.53％），诚实/不诚实（1.53％），犯罪/非犯罪（0.44％），现实/不切实际（0.22％）。浆液/不详（0.22％）。这些剧本反对派呈现各种逻辑机制。它们忽略了明显（18.16％），类比（13.79％），并置（12.47％），并行性（11.38％），推断后果（6.56％），效力映射（6.35％），推理出错（5.47％），夸张（5.25％），逆转（3.28％），巧合（3.28％），角色逆转（2.63％），自我破坏（2.63％），几乎情况（2.41％），恶性循环（1.97％），花园 - 路径（0.88％），隐性并行性（0.88％），比例（0.44％），现场限制（0.44％），假类比（0.44％），Cradylism（0.44％），参照歧义（0.44％），角色交换（0.22 ％）和图 - 地面逆转（0.22％）。幽默通过漫反射差异59.74％，以打孔线（28％）结束，使用MoranArtative破坏（8％）和巧合（3.7％）。从调查结果中，可以得出结论，大卫塞纳里斯'我说漂亮有一天很有趣。然而，由于它以正常/异常的反对主导地位，并且通过漫反应而通过漫反射，大卫塞纳里斯的读者漂亮有一天可能会发现幽默，特别是非母语人士的困难可能会发现困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号