首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications >NSA simplification algorithm: geometrical vs. visual quality
【24h】

NSA simplification algorithm: geometrical vs. visual quality

机译:NSA简化算法:几何与视觉质量

获取原文

摘要

The model simplification algorithms have a great interest in a variety of areas, since it allow the replacement of large models by approximations with far fewer cells for manipulation and visualization purposes. The quality of the simplified models and the execution times are the main aspects to distinguish the algorithms. Normally the quality evaluation is based on the analysis of geometrical errors of the simplified models but it is not enough to evaluate the visual quality of simplified models. This paper presents a edge collapsing-based simplification algorithm, called NSA, for polygonal models that is faster than the other algorithms found in the literature that use the edge collapse operation. However it makes a good trade-off between time performance and mesh quality. Besides, in some cases, the visual quality of simplified models created by NSA algorithm is superior to the visual quality of simplified models created by other algorithms, particularly for models that have planar zones (CAD models). Some results are compared between NSA and QSlim algorithms to illustrate the geometrical and visual quality of simplified models.
机译:模型简化算法对各种领域具有很大的兴趣,因为它允许通过近似更换大型型号,用于操纵和可视化目的。简化模型和执行时间的质量是区分算法的主要方面。通常,质量评估基于对简化模型的几何误差的分析,但不足以评估简化模型的视觉质量。本文介绍了一种基于边缘折叠的简化算法,称为NSA,用于比使用边缘折叠操作的文献中的其他算法更快的多边形模型。然而,它在时间性能和网格质量之间进行了良好的权衡。此外,在某些情况下,NSA算法创建的简化模型的视觉质量优于由其他算法创建的简化模型的视觉质量,特别是对于具有平面区域(CAD模型)的模型。在NSA和QSLIM算法之间比较了一些结果,以说明简化模型的几何和视觉质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号