• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Getting It Right for Aboriginal People Gets It Right for Everybody: Reflections from Australia
【24h】

Getting It Right for Aboriginal People Gets It Right for Everybody: Reflections from Australia

机译：对土着人民来说，对每个人来说都是正确的：来自澳大利亚的思考

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In 1997, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) realised that despite substantial epidemiological research on Aboriginal health, health disparities were not reducing. 'Research' was viewed as something done 'on' not 'with' Aboriginal people; some felt they were 'the most researched people on Earth'. Extensive Aboriginal-led consultation processes culminated in three 'NHMRC Road Maps' that inform ethical guidelines and funding, driving substantial change in the people, process and impacts of Aboriginal health research. Among the Road Map consultation's central tenets is the ultimate aim of Aboriginal health research to enhance Spirit and Integrity. This requires research processes to be empowering by operationalising (walking the talk) five core values (ways of working): Equality, Respect, Responsibility, Reciprocity, and Survival and Protection. This session focuses largely on causes and consequences of health disparities among Canadian Indigenous Peoples, whose colonial histories and environmental justice challenges parallel those of Indigenous Australians. Both groups also experience distress from disruption of intimate links between traditional foods and cultural identity exacerbated by pollution and climate change. This discussion on ethics reflects on some key questions about transcultural research with Indigenous Peoples; e.g. Are we doing enough to promote the development of Indigenous researchers to lead Indigenous research with their own voices? Does cross-cultural environmental epidemiology require mixed methods for validity and effective knowledge translation? To what extent are we operationalising empowering values in the research we undertake as partners with these communities? What does that look like in practice? Are we measuring it? Should we be heeding the NHMRC Road Maps about research values and ethics for everyone we work with; not only Indigenous Peoples, but all who enable and participate in our research?
机译：1997年，澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会（NHMRC）意识到，尽管原住民健康实质性的流行病学研究，健康差距并没有减少。 “研究”被看作是东西“上”没有做“与”土著人;有些人认为他们是“最研究地球上的人”。丰富的原住民主导的磋商进程最终在三个“NHMRC路线图”即告知道德准则和资金，推动在人员，流程实质性的变化和原住民健康研究的影响。在路线图咨询的中心原则是原住民健康研究的最终目的是为了增进精神和完整性。这就要求研究过程要由尽快运行五个核心价值（工作方式）授权（言行一致）：平等，尊重，责任，互惠，以及生存和保护。本次会议主要侧重于原因和加拿大原住民，他们的殖民历史和环境正义的挑战平行的土著澳大利亚人之间的健康差距的后果。这两个群体也从传统的食品和文化认同的污染和气候变化加剧之间密切关系的破裂经历痛苦。关于道德这次讨论反映了关于与土著人民跨文化研究的一些关键问题;例如我们是否做了足够推动土著研究人员的发展引领本土研究与自己的声音？是否跨文化环境流行病学要求的有效性，并有效的知识转化混合的方法呢？在何种程度上是我们在研究尽快运行授权值，我们承诺与这些社区合作伙伴？在实践中是什么样的？难道我们衡量它？我们应该听从NHMRC路线图有关的研究价值和道德观与我们每个人都工作;不仅是原住民，但所有谁能够并且参与我们的研究？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号