• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research Special Issue no.58; International Symposium on Bio-Logging Science; 20030317-21; Tokyo(JP) >Subjectivity in bio-logging science: do logged data mislead?
【24h】

Subjectivity in bio-logging science: do logged data mislead?

机译：生物测井科学的主观性：测井数据是否会误导？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Logging of data using animal-attached archival units (bio-logging) involves potential sources of subjectivity that are reviewed in the present paper. Subjectivity may be the result of technical limitations of which the selection of the correct sampling frequency is particularly critical. Mistakes or aberrant data can also result from transitory defaults in the loggers functioning. Similarly, the use of purpose-written software to pre-process logged data before analysis is another step during which substantial modification of the raw data can occur. Apart from technical limitations, bio-logging devices are also known to modify the behaviour of the animal studied. Finally, arbitrary conclusions can eventually be drawn out from the 'visual' analysis of logged-data. The second part of this review proposes a non-exhaustive list of precautions so as to enhance objectivity in bio-logging approach. Among these precautions, assessment of the impact that data-logger may have on the animal, appropriate calibrations (for example for transformation of the raw measurements into useable variables) and multi-data sampling are useful steps in bio-logging utilization.
机译：使用动物所附档案单位记录数据（生物记录）涉及主观性的潜在来源，本文对此进行了综述。主观性可能是技术限制的结果，因此选择正确的采样频率至关重要。错误或异常的数据也可能是由于记录器运行时的暂时默认值所致。同样，使用目的编写的软件在分析之前对记录的数据进行预处理是另一个步骤，在此期间可能会发生原始数据的大量修改。除了技术局限性之外，还已知生物记录装置会改变所研究动物的行为。最后，最终可以从对记录数据的“视觉”分析中得出任意结论。这篇评论的第二部分提出了一些非详尽的预防措施清单，以增强生物测井方法的客观性。在这些预防措施中，评估数据记录器可能对动物产生的影响，进行适当的校准（例如，将原始测量值转换为可用变量）和多数据采样是生物记录利用中的有用步骤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号