• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Model-based reasoning in science and technology : Abduction, logic, and computational discovery >Modeling the Epistemological Multipolarity of Semiotic Objects
【24h】

Modeling the Epistemological Multipolarity of Semiotic Objects

机译：对符号对象的认识论多极性建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

For practitioners of semiotics the most controversial questions constitute the status and nature of the semiotic object equalized with the sign separated from its object (s) of reference or encompassing its object (s) reference, i.e., whether the sign is a unilateral entity or a plurilateral unit comprised of interrelated constituents, or a relation (a network of relations) between those constituents. Further questions refer to the manifestations of signs, namely, whether they appear in material or spiritual (corporeal or intelligible, physical or mental), concrete or abstract, real or ideal forms of being, being examined subjectively or objectively in their extraorganismic or intraorganismic manifestations. Accordingly, signs are approached either extra- or introspectively, through individual tokens or general types, occurring in the realm of man only; in the realm of all living systems, or in the universe of creatures, extraterrestrial and divine in nature. These varieties of sign conceptions exhibit not only differences in terminology but also in the formation of their visual presentations. Bearing in mind the need for their analysis and comparison, the practitioner of semiotic disciplines has to find a parameter or a matrix that would contain features and components characteristic for particular approaches to their forms of being and manifestation. Within the framework of this article, the adept readers will be provided with a theory-and-method related outlooks on the token and type relationships between the mental and concrete existence modes of semiotic objects and their objects of reference. Having reviewed all hitherto known sign conceptions, it will be demonstrated how their two main components, the signans and signatum, may be modeled with their collective and individual properties as oscillating between the possible four epistemological positions: logical positivism, rational empiricism, empirical rationalism, and absolute rationalism.
机译：对于符号学的从业者来说，最具争议的问题是符号符号与符号的参照对象分开或包含其参照对象相等的符号的地位和性质，即符号是单边实体还是符号。由相互关联的成分组成的多边单位，或这些成分之间的关​​系（关系网络）。进一步的问题涉及符号的表现形式，即它们是否以物质或精神（身体或可理解的，身体或精神的），具体的或抽象的，真实的或理想的存在形式出现，以其有机外或有机体内的主观或客观方式进行主观或客观检验。 。因此，标志是通过单独的标记或一般类型（仅在人的领域中出现）来进行内省或内省处理的；在所有生命系统的领域中，或者在自然界中的外星生物和神圣生物的宇宙中。这些种类多样的标志概念不仅在术语上表现出差异，而且在视觉表现形式上也表现出差异。考虑到对它们进行分析和比较的需要，符号学学科的从业者必须找到一个参数或矩阵，该参数或矩阵应包含针对其存在和表现形式的特定方法所具有的特征和成分特征。在本文的框架内，将为熟练的读者提供有关符号学和符号学对象的心理和具体存在方式与其参考对象之间的代币和类型关系的理论和方法方面的观点。在回顾了所有迄今为止已知的符号概念之后，我们将展示如何将它们的两个主要组成部分（信号符号和信号符号）以它们的集体和个人属性建模，以在可能的四种认识论立场之间进行振荡：逻辑实证主义，理性经验主义，经验理性主义，和绝对理性主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号