• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshop on RNA Biochemistry and Biotechnology Poznan, Poland October 10-17, 1998 >How risky is direct democracy for basic science?
【24h】

How risky is direct democracy for basic science?

机译：直接民主对基础科学的风险有多大？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A threatful national referendum which aimed at prohibiting gene technology in Switzerland to a large extend by prohibiting transgenic animals, deliberate release of genetic modified roganisms, the patenting of animals and plants as well as their parts and products and by demanding a general reversal of burden of proof in research, has initiated the discussion about the necessity to rethink public communication about new technologies and risk communication both on the side of science as on the side of industry. The paper proposes the installation of three new institutions: first of all the implementation of a Competence Center for Biosafety which fulfills a new form of risk communication as well as the cantonal execution of federal ordinances, second a new institution for establishing strong links between Universities and High Schools to improve information transfer of basic science to the public and third the installation of an information system on the internet.
机译：一场具有威胁性的全民投票，旨在通过禁止转基因动物，故意释放基因改造的罗汉菌，动植物及其部分和产品的专利权以及要求全面减轻人类负担来广泛禁止瑞士的基因技术研究证明，已经引发了关于重新思考科学技术和工业方面对新技术和风险沟通的公共传播的必要性的讨论。该文件提出了三个新机构的设立：首先是实施生物安全能力中心，该中心以一种新的形式进行风险沟通，并在各州执行联邦条例，其次是建立一个新机构，以建立大学与大学之间的紧密联系。高中改善基础科学向公众的信息传递，第三是在互联网上安装信息系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号