• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>IAEE annual international conference >Integrated energy and climate change policy in the EU –only GHG reduction policy in disguise?
【24h】

Integrated energy and climate change policy in the EU –only GHG reduction policy in disguise?

机译：欧盟的能源与气候变化综合政策–只是变相的减少温室气体排放政策？

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Integrated energy and climate change policy has played an important role in the European Union and their member states during the last years. There have been a lot of initiatives to establish an integrated energy and climate change policy from both the European Commission and from the governments of various member states. In 2007, the German government started an initiative during their EU presidency, which was in addition linked to an initiative at the G8 summit in Heiligendamm – also under the guidance of German EU presidency. A closer look on these initiatives and their outcomes raises the question: Is the integrated policy approach really something new? Or is it only a political neologism to implement the climate protection forerunner goals – on the one hand to improve efficiency, to increase the share of renewables, to improve the use of biomass and on the other hand to reduce the GHG emissions? In this contribution we argue that energy policy and climate change policy are not equal players in the European Policy. Energy policy and climate change policy have not been blended into a new integrated policy. Instead, climate policy comes first, and the energy policy has to subordinate. The former aim of EU policy that all three aims – security of supply, efficiency and environmental aspects – should be equally treated was dismissed. The approach to establish an integrated energy and climate change policy is not as innovative as the EU said. It is more or less climate change policy in disguise. The motive behind that neologism is found in the obstacles the GHG reduction policy faces: The latest monitoring reports of the fulfilments of the Kyoto obligations have shown that there is at least a gap between the commitments the EU and their Member states have made and the actual figures. Therefore the EU has to act and react, if it still wants to lead the way in a global context to reduce GHG – and especially carbon dioxide – emissions.
机译：在过去的几年中，综合能源和气候变化政策在欧盟及其成员国中发挥了重要作用。欧盟委员会和各成员国政府已经提出了许多倡议来制定综合的能源和气候变化政策。 2007年，德国政府在担任欧盟轮值主席期间启动了一项举措，此外，该举措还与在德国担任欧盟轮值主席国的八国集团在海利根达姆（Hiligendamm）举行的八国集团峰会上的举措有关。仔细研究这些举措及其结果会引发一个问题：综合政策方法真的是新事物吗？还是实施气候保护先行者目标只是一种政治上的新词-一方面提高效率，增加可再生能源的份额，改善生物质的利用，另一方面减少温室气体的排放？在这一贡献中，我们认为能源政策和气候变化政策在欧洲政策中并不平等。能源政策和气候变化政策尚未纳入新的综合政策。相反，气候政策是第一位的，而能源政策必须服从。欧盟政策的前一个目标-三个目标-供应安全，效率和环境方面-应被同等对待，这被驳回了。建立一体化的能源与气候变化政策的方法并不像欧盟所说的那样创新。或多或少是变相的气候变化政策。在减少温室气体政策面临的障碍中发现了新词的动机：最新的监测报告显示，履行《京都议定书》义务的过程中，欧盟及其成员国所作的承诺与实际履行的义务之间至少存在差距。图。因此，如果欧盟仍想在全球范围内引领减少温室气体（尤其是二氧化碳）排放的道路，则必须采取行动并作出反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号