• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 43rd annual loss prevention symposium >Optimizing Qualitative Hazard Evaluation
【24h】

Optimizing Qualitative Hazard Evaluation

机译：优化定性危害评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper discusses the lessons gleaned from more than 5000 qualitative hazard evaluations completed by the authors and compatriots over the past 18-years. The learnings were from project risk reviews, management of change (MOC) risk reviews, full unit process hazard analyses (PHAs), and PHA revalidations. (All of these evaluations fall within the qualitative category of CCPS's "Hazard Identifications and Risk Assessments [HIRAs]," required in the Risk-Based Process Safety [RBPS] guide [CCPS, 2007].) The experience covers all chemical and related industry. The paper shares secrets that will speed up your hazard evaluations while not sacrificing thoroughness. Issues covered include: Should you project your notes during the meetings? Should you use dedicated software? Should you have a dedicated scribe? Should you define the methods and make sectionsodes ahead of the meetings? What methods should you choose and when? What documentation rules speed up the meeting? What facilitation rules speed up the meetings without crimping brainstorming? What mistakes kill brainstorming and also slow the meetings? Data based on thousands of PHAs is presented, along with a condensed set of optimization rules.
机译：本文讨论了作者和同胞在过去18年中完成的5000多次定性危害评估所获得的经验教训。这些学习来自项目风险审查，变更管理（MOC）风险审查，完整单位过程危害分析（PHA）和PHA重新验证。 （所有这些评估均属于基于风险的过程安全[RBPS]指南[CCPS，2007年]所要求的CCPS的“危害识别和风险评估[HIRA]”的定性类别。）经验涵盖了所有化学及相关行业。本文分享了一些秘密，这些秘密将加快您的危害评估速度，同时又不影响完整性。涉及的问题包括：您是否应该在会议期间投影笔记？您应该使用专用软件吗？您应该有专门的抄写员吗？您是否应该定义方法并在会议之前安排科室/节点？您应该选择什么方法？何时选择？哪些文档规则可以加快会议速度？哪些促进规则可以在不引起头脑风暴的情况下加快会议速度？哪些错误会扼杀头脑风暴并使会议变慢？呈现了基于成千上万个PHA的数据，以及一组精简的优化规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号