Comparative file I/O methods in APL2

机译：APL2中的比较文件I / O方法

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper will discuss the state of file I/O in APL2. The intent is to educate the readers on the options open to them so that they can choose the file I/O method most suitable for their needs.Topics will include evolution of file I/O over the years, current status on a platform-by-platform basis, mainframe to workstation migration issues, suitability of the different methods available for various tasks, and performance notes.

机译：本文将讨论APL2中文件I / O的状态。目的是对读者开放的选项进行教育，以便他们可以选择最适合其需求的文件I / O方法。主题将包括多年来文件I / O的发展，平台上的当前状态。平台基础，大型机到工作站的迁移问题，适用于各种任务的不同方法的适用性以及性能说明。

著录项

来源
《Proceedings of the international conference on APL-Berlin-2000 conference》|2000年|P.241-246|共6页
会议地点 Berlin(DE)
作者
Nancy Wheeler;
展开▼
作者单位

IBM APL Products and Services, San Jose, California;

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类计算技术、计算机技术;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comparative evaluation of four different sterilization methods on contaminated endodontic files [J] . Malathi Yenni, Sujatha Bandi, Sai Sankar Jogendra Avula, Chrismed Journal of Health and Research . 2017,第3期

机译：四种不同消毒方法对污染的牙髓锉的比较评估
2. A comparative study of intracranial EEG files using nonlinear classification methods. [J] . Tito M, Cabrerizo M, Ayala M, Annals of Biomedical Engineering: The Journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society . 2010,第1期

机译：使用非线性分类方法比较颅内脑电图文件。
3. A Comparative Study of Intracranial EEG Files Using Nonlinear Classification Methods [J] . Maria Tito, Mercedes Cabrerizo, Melvin Ayala, Annals of Biomedical Engineering . 2010,第1期

机译：非线性分类方法比较颅内脑电图文件的比较研究
4. An APL2 tool box investigating Schwarz methods [C] . Christoph Pospiech International conference on APL . 1992

机译：APL2工具箱，用于研究Schwarz方法
5. Struggling Readers and Dyslexic Readers: A Comparative Study of Student Intervention Files [D] . Spengler, Katherine Casey. 2020

机译：努力读者和诵读诵读读者：学生干预文件的比较研究
6. The Public-Use National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality Files: Methods of Reidentification Risk Avoidance and Comparative Analysis [O] . Kimberly Lochner, Robert A. Hummer, Stephanie Bartee, -1

机译：公众使用的国家卫生访问调查链接的死亡率档案：重新识别风险规避的方法和比较分析
7. Figure 6: (A) Tree resulted the standard MP analysis of the 98-loci supermatrix of the Great Apes (Hominidae, Primates, Mammalia) constructed using the modified summary of Lehtonen et al. (2011) (see “Materials and Methods” for the details) and a posteriori rooted relatively Papio (length = 12,092, CI = 0.7877, RI = 0.5597); 34,022 characters are constant, and the number of the parsimony-informative characters is equal to 4,311. MP BS values are provided below branches. The only characters with non-ambiguous value of the outgroup (Papio) have been saved within concatenated alignment; (B) the average consensus tree of the score 0.00084 resulted the analysis of the Hennigian forest of the 5,507 trees derived from the binary representation of the 98-loci supermatrix of the Great Apes (Hominidae, Primates, Mammalia) (see “Materials and Methods” for the details); Papio is assumed to be the best all-plesiomorphic group. “Additional…” FORESTER’s output tree file (see “Materials and Methods” for the details) selected for future analyses; (C) the average consensus tree of the score 0.00090 resulted the analysis of the Hennigian forest of the 5,339 trees derived from the modified binary representation of the 98-loci supermatrix of the Great Apes (Hominidae, Primates, Mammalia) (see 6.I. and “Materials and Methods” for the details), but with all 168 trees, which contain the clade (Homo plus Pan) have been removed from the input forest. “Additional…” FORESTER’s output tree file (see “Materials and Methods”) selected for future analyses. [O] . -1

机译：图6：（A）树导致的标准MP分析的98-基因座的类人猿（人科，灵长类动物，哺乳动物），使用莱赫托宁等人的修改的摘要构成的超级矩阵。（2011）（参见细节“材料和方法”）以及相对植根狒狒后验概率（长度= 12092，CI = 0.7877，RI = 0.5597）; 34022个字符是恒定的，并且简约信息的字符数等于4311。下面提供分支MP BS值。与外类群（狒狒）的非模糊值的唯一的字符已被保存的级联对准内; （B）的得分0.00084的平均一致树导致从巨猿（原始人类，灵长类动物，哺乳动物）的98座超级矩阵的二进制表示获得的5507棵的Hennigian森林的分析（见“材料和方法”为细节）;狒狒被认为是最好的全祖征群。 “其他...” FORESTER的输出树文件（请参阅详细信息“材料和方法”），用于进一步的分析; （C）的分数0.00090的平均一致树导致从98个位点的类人猿（人科，灵长类动物，哺乳动物）的超级矩阵（见6.I的改性二进制表示导出的5339种树木的Hennigian森林的分析以及“材料和方法”的详细说明），但所有168棵，其中包含的分支（智人加PAN）已经从输入林中删除。 “其他...” FORESTER的输出树文件（参见“材料和方法”），用于进一步的分析。
8. Comparative Study of PDF Generation Methods: Measuring Loss of Fidelity When Converting Arabic and Persian MS Word Files to PDF [R] . Herceg, P. M., Ball, C. N. 2011

机译：pDF生成方法的比较研究：将阿拉伯语和波斯语ms Word文件转换为pDF时测量保真度的损失

Comparative file I/O methods in APL2

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅