• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Sixteenth symposium on explosives and pyrotechnics >Norma In Relation to What?
【24h】

Norma In Relation to What?

机译：诺玛与什么有关？

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One of the problems in evaluating the firing probabilities for Electroexplosives Devices (EEDs) is the assumption of if not most tests of EEDs are run using the assumption that the firing probability is distributed normally in relation to the current or voltage amplitude of the applied waveform. Franklin Applied Physics has always used the assumption that the probability is distributed normally in relation to the current or voltage amplitude of the applied waveform. Franklin Applied Physics has always used the assumption that the probability was distributed normally as the logarithm of the current or voltage. For that matter we also run all our RF sensitivity tests assuming that the probability is distributed log normally with power. Testing the a ssumption, since both assumptins give very close to the same result close to the middle of the distribution, involves testing of EEDs far from the mean where the probability of firing is either very big or very little and very many devices must be exposed. The necessary tests are therefore very expensive, due to bot labor anddevice cost, and still hold out no large chance of determining definitively the actual distribution with any reasonable amount of money available.
机译：评估电爆炸装置（EED）发射概率的问题之一是，假设不是大多数电子发射装置测试都是在假设发射概率相对于所施加波形的电流或电压幅度呈正态分布的情况下进行的。富兰克林应用物理公司一直使用这样的假设，即概率相对于所施加波形的电流或电压幅度呈正态分布。富兰克林应用物理公司一直使用这样的假设，即概率以正态分布为电流或电压的对数。为此，我们还运行了所有RF灵敏度测试，并假设概率与功率呈正态分布。测试一个假设，因为两个假设在分布的中间位置都给出非常接近的相同结果，因此涉及到EED的测试，而不是发射概率很大或很小且必须暴露很多设备的均值。因此，由于机器人劳动和设备成本的原因，必要的测试非常昂贵，并且仍然没有很大的机会以可能的合理数量来确定最终的实际分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号