【24h】

Risk Analysis on the Payment of the Goods on the Site in a Construction Contract

机译:施工合同中现场货款支付的风险分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Materials and equipment suppliers (here in after referred to as "suppliers"),as one of participants in the construction project,have borne a risk of failure to receive the payment after the delivery of materials and equipment to the site in accordance with the contract. Once the contractor goes bankrupt before paying the suppliers,the liquidator or the recipient will often deny the debt with regard to the delivered materials and equipment by Bankruptcy Law,and only pay a small fraction of the bill to the supplier,and sometimes even pay nothing. Thus the suppliers tend to suffer a great loss. In addition,there are no relevant laws and regulations in China,expressed or implied,for the payment of the goods after arrival on the site and their ownership in a construction project,which has become the root cause of disputes. Therefore,a reasonable definition of the ownership transference of the goods on the site is the key to solve this problem. For the balance of risks,the delivery of goods on the site should be defined as goods installed on the entities of the construction project. In this way,the risk not only is shared reasonably by the contractors and owners,but also ensures the basic interests of the suppliers. So the definition is suggested here to fill the gap in a construction contract.
机译:材料和设备供应商(以下简称“供应商”)作为建设项目的参与者之一,在按照合同将材料和设备交付到现场后,存在无法收到付款的风险。一旦承包商在向供应商付款之前破产,清算人或收货人通常会根据《破产法》否认有关已交付材料和设备的债务,只向供应商支付一小部分账单,有时甚至不付款。因此,供应商往往遭受巨大损失。此外,在中国,没有明示或暗示的法律法规规定货物到达现场后的付款及其在建设项目中的所有权,这已成为引起争议的根本原因。因此,合理定义现场货物的所有权转移是解决该问题的关键。为了平衡风险,应将现场交付的货物定义为安装在建设项目实体上的货物。这样,风险不仅可以由承包商和业主合理分担,而且可以确保供应商的基本利益。因此,这里提出了定义以填补建筑合同中的空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号