• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Shale energy engineering conference 2014: technical challenges, environmental issues, and pubulic policy >The Grey Science of Wetland Avoidance
【24h】

The Grey Science of Wetland Avoidance

机译：避免湿地的灰色科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Exact wetland boundaries often are not easily identified. Natural gas producers and midstream operators often operate under deadlines and restrictions that are not compatible with regulatory timelines. As a result, they must rely on their consultants to make black and white decisions about project siting and routing when the science and regulations may not fully support such a call, leaving room for further discussion and potential judgment calls, or "grey" areas. The outcome of similar situations can vary based on the geomorphic landscape, the environmental sensitivity of the general area, different regulatory agencies, and even differing opinions within the same regulatory agency. A comprehensive understanding of the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Wetlands Delineation Manual (Manual) and the Corps Regional Supplements, as well as state-specific water quality regulations are required to make defensible decisions in the field so that projects can proceed ahead of regulatory concurrence. This requires thorough documentation of questionable areas to address project pressures, while avoiding the inherent risks of differing opinions with regulators (who may not have the same history of the site as the consultant does) after costly design, construction schedules, or delivery contracts are in place. These decisions require frequent and open communication between the producer or midstream operator and the consultant.
机译：确切的湿地边界往往不容易确定。天然气生产商和中游运营商通常在与监管时间表不兼容的期限和限制下运营。结果，当科学和法规可能无法完全支持这样的呼吁时，他们必须依靠顾问做出有关项目选址和路线的黑白决定，从而为进一步的讨论和潜在的判断呼吁或“灰色”领域留出空间。相似情况的结果可能会因地貌景观，总体区域的环境敏感性，不同的监管机构，甚至同一监管机构内的不同观点而异。需要对1987年美国陆军工程兵团（Cops）湿地定界手册（手册）和兵团区域补编以及各州的水质法规进行全面了解，以便在现场做出合理的决定，以便项目可以继续进行监管并发。这需要彻底记录可疑区域，以解决项目压力，同时避免在进行昂贵的设计，施工进度或交付合同后，与监管机构（他们可能与顾问的历史不一样）与监管者意见分歧的固有风险。地点。这些决定需要生产商或中游运营商与顾问之间进行频繁且开放的沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号