• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Re-reading Genesis 1--3 in the light of creation myths from ancient Chinese texts.
【24h】

Re-reading Genesis 1--3 in the light of creation myths from ancient Chinese texts.

机译：根据古代中国文字中的创造神话重新阅读创世纪1--3。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aim of this thesis will be to explore the meaning of Genesis 1-3 in the light of creation myths from ancient Chinese texts. This thesis consists of five chapters. The first chapter will introduce the intention of writing such a thesis, and then a discussion of the cross-textual method, as defined there, will be given. An outline of the dissertation and the relationship among the chapters will be presented at the end of the chapter.; In the second chapter a critical review of previous studies on Genesis 1-3 will be given according to four different methods: historical criticism, literary criticism, the comparative approach and feminist interpretation. After pointing out the limitations of each, the author will argue in favor of a cross-textual hermeneutics in studying Genesis 1-3.; In the third chapter the thesis will first outline the history of western scholarship on Chinese creation myths. Admittedly, this is a huge subject, so selected examples, hopefully representative, will be used. Then a review of the research done by Chinese scholars in the first half of the twentieth century will follow. In that period Chinese scholars had a strong interest in creation myths in order to look for the core of the Chinese spirit and culture, by returning to the fountainhead, hoping to encourage people with their reinterpretation of Chinese creation myths. I will argue that their effort is significant for my understanding of the meaning of creation myths.; The fourth chapter is the core of the whole dissertation. Cross-textual hermeneutics, as defined in chapter one, will be applied to the reading of the two kinds of creation traditions. Cosmologies, cosmogonies, the origin of human beings, and the relationship between God and human beings are four areas chosen for interpretation. In the author's opinion, the progress of crossing is more important than obtaining definitive conclusions. It exactly repensents the difference which I have discussed in chapter two between the cross-textual method and the comparative method.; The last chapter will present the contributions and limitations of this thesis. Summing up, this dissertation provides a new perspective for reading Genesis 1-3 side-by-side with creation myths of ancient Chinese texts.
机译：本文的目的是根据古代中国文字中的创造神话来探讨创世纪1-3的意义。本文共分五章。第一章将介绍撰写此类论文的意图，然后将讨论在那里定义的跨文本方法。论文的概述以及各章之间的关系将在本章末尾提出。在第二章中，将根据四种不同的方法对创世记1-3的先前研究进行批判性回顾：历史批评，文学批评，比较方法和女权主义解释。在指出每种方法的局限性之后，作者将在研究创世纪1-3时主张采用跨文本的诠释学。在第三章中，论文将首先概述西方学者关于中国创造神话的历史。诚然，这是一个巨大的主题，因此将使用选定的示例（希望可以代表）。然后，将对中国学者在20世纪上半叶所做的研究进行回顾。在那个时期，中国学者对创造神话产生了浓厚的兴趣，他们通过回到源头，以鼓励人们重新诠释中国创造神话来寻找中国精神和文化的核心。我认为他们的努力对我理解创造神话的意义很重要。第四章是全文的核心。第一章中定义的跨文本诠释学将适用于两种创作传统的阅读。宇宙学，宇宙论，人类起源以及上帝与人类之间的关系是我们选择的四个解释领域。作者认为，杂交的进展比获得明确的结论更为重要。它恰好说明了我在第二章中讨论的跨文本方法和比较方法之间的区别。最后一章将介绍本论文的贡献和局限性。综上所述，本论文为与古代中国文字创造神话并存的创世记1-3提供了新的视角。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lin, Yan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Literature Asian.; Religion General.; Religion Biblical Studies.; Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 194 p.
  • 总页数 194
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教;圣经;宗教;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号