• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The media-government relations: Comparative analysis of the United States, South Korea and North Korea's media coverage of foreign policy.
【24h】

The media-government relations: Comparative analysis of the United States, South Korea and North Korea's media coverage of foreign policy.

机译：媒体与政府的关系：对美国，韩国和朝鲜对外交政策的媒体报道的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the media-government relations through a comparative analysis of the United States, North Korea, and South Korea's news media coverage of foreign policy between 2000 and 2001 during which the three nations were actively involved in diplomatic talks, but failed. This study observes how reporting of foreign policy supports or challenges a government by analyzing themes, news sources, opinion direction, and media representation, and explores what determines the role of the news media in relation to government.;Content analysis is conducted to measure media attention, valence, news source, and media representation. Media attention is measured by grouping the thematic frequency into 48 bi-weekly intervals. Valence (opinion direction) is assigned to all voices appeared in a news story in accordance with its consistency with a nation's foreign policy. A nation's foreign policy is conceptualized on the basis of a President's frame of reference in order to distinguish a government's perspective from other contending forces' perspectives.;The research is conducted based on two key concerns and questions. First, there is a concern that the media reporting of foreign policy is constrained by a government. If so, how can the policy be contested by different forces? Second, if each nation's journalism practice represents a unique mode of media and political system, how can the role of media in relation to government be compared?;This study found that first, the role the news media shifts in the range from a site of struggle to a site of ideological reproduction, depending on the existence of political challenge and the construction of critical media discourse. Second, when a nation's foreign policy addresses national interests, it gains the support of its public. However, it has no guarantee to be equally supported by other nations if there is a conflict between two nations' interests. Constituting hegemony within a national boundary is not tantamount to constituting the same hegemony in the international community. The disparity between two nations' interests can cause damage to the leadership when it becomes a critical media discourse.
机译：这项研究的目的是通过对美国，朝鲜和韩国的新闻媒体在2000年至2001年之间对外交政策的积极报道进行比较分析来评估媒体与政府之间的关系，但失败了。这项研究通过分析主题，新闻来源，舆论导向和媒体代表，观察了外交政策的报道如何支持或挑战政府，并探讨了决定新闻媒体相对于政府的作用的因素;进行内容分析以衡量媒体注意，价，新闻来源和媒体代表。通过将主题频率分为48个双周间隔来衡量媒体的注意力。根据新闻与国家外交政策的一致性，将价（观点方向）分配给新闻报道中出现的所有声音。一个国家的外交政策是在总统的参考框架的基础上概念化的，以便将政府的观点与其他竞争力量的观点区分开来。该研究是基于两个关键问题和问题进行的。首先，令人担忧的是，媒体对外交政策的报道受到政府的限制。如果是这样，该政策如何受到不同力量的质疑？其次，如果每个国家的新闻实践都代表着独特的媒体和政治体系模式，那么如何比较媒体在政府方面的作用呢？该研究发现，首先，新闻媒体的作用是从一个地方转移到另一个地方。根据政治挑战的存在和批评性媒体话语的构建，努力向意识形态再生产的地方努力。其次，当一个国家的外交政策解决国家利益时，它会得到其公众的支持。但是，如果两国利益之间存在冲突，则不能保证得到其他国家的平等支持。在国家边界内构成霸权，并不等于在国际社会中构成同一霸权。当两国间的利益分歧成为关键的媒体言论时，可能会对领导层造成损害。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kang, Wha In.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 Journalism.;Library Science.;Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 294 p.
  • 总页数 294
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 新闻学、新闻事业;传播理论;图书馆学、图书馆事业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号