• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The struggle over land rights: A study of indigenous property rights in Indonesia.
【24h】

The struggle over land rights: A study of indigenous property rights in Indonesia.

机译：土地权之争：印度尼西亚土著财产权研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research examines conflicts between the government and customary law communities in Indonesia over land rights which have existed for one and a half century since the colonization era. It focuses on several issues. The first is how the existing provisions set forth about customary law communities and their indigenous property rights. The second is the requirements for the existence of customary law communities and indigenous property rights. The third is the procedure for the determination of the existence of customary law communities and indigenous property rights, while the last is the institution authorized to resolve disputes.As the basis of the discussion, literature review is conducted on property rights, customary law and on the state's role in establishing a clear and secure property rights. In Indonesia, information is obtained through surveys and interviews with Baduy and Lampung customary law communities, government agencies, politicians, forestry companies, non-government organizations, police and military officers.There are several main findings. First, the existing laws on land have not clearly set forth about customary law communities and the existence of indigenous property rights. In fact, the existing provisions are very complicated and do not conform to the values applicable in the communities. Second, there is no shared vision on customary law communities and indigenous property rights. Third, there are overlap claims between the government and communities over land rights. Fourth, in principal, there is unbroken chain between colonial's policies and the Indonesian government's policy on customary law communities and indigenous property rights. Last, the existing judicial system and rule of evidence are considered incapable to resolve the existing land disputes.This research recommends the government to at least undertake three important actions. First, it is necessary to have clear regulations on customary law community and indigenous property rights. Second, it is necessary to establish a trustable independent institution to resolve land disputes. And third, to have anthropologies and other unofficial written evidence as part of rule of evidence in land law disputes. In the process, the experience of Malaysia and Australia in dealing with native title serves as a priceless lesson to resolve disputes.
机译：这项研究考察了印度尼西亚政府和习惯法界之间在土地权利方面的冲突，这种冲突自殖民时代以来已经存在了一个半个世纪。它着重于几个问题。第一个是现有规定如何阐述习惯法共同体及其土著财产权利。第二个是对习惯法共同体和土著财产权存在的要求。第三个是确定习惯法共同体和土著财产权存在的程序，最后一个是有权解决争端的机构。作为讨论的基础，对财产权，习惯法和国家在建立清晰安全的产权中的作用。在印度尼西亚，信息是通过对Baduy和Lampung习惯法社区，政府机构，政客，林业公司，非政府组织，警察和军官进行的调查和访谈获得的。主要发现有几个。首先，关于土地习惯法的共同体和土著财产权的存在，关于土地的现行法律并未明确提出。实际上，现有规定非常复杂，不符合社区适用的价值观。第二，关于习惯法共同体和土著财产权没有共同的愿景。第三，政府与社区之间在土地权方面存在重叠的主张。第四，原则上，殖民地的政策与印度尼西亚政府关于习惯法共同体和土著财产权的政策之间存在不间断的联系。最后，认为现有的司法制度和证据规则无法解决现有的土地纠纷。本研究建议政府至少采取三项重要行动。首先，有必要对习惯法共同体和土著财产权制定明确的法规。其次，有必要建立一个值得信赖的独立机构来解决土地纠纷。第三，在土地法纠纷中将人类学和其他非官方的书面证据作为证据规则的一部分。在此过程中，马来西亚和澳大利亚在处理原住民土地所有权方面的经验可作为解决争议的无价课程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Toha, Kurnia.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 405 p.
  • 总页数 405
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号