• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Institutional ambiguity, the role of local government and organization growth --- --- A case study of a privately-owned automobile enterprise in China.
【24h】

Institutional ambiguity, the role of local government and organization growth --- --- A case study of a privately-owned automobile enterprise in China.

机译：制度上的歧义，地方政府的作用和组织的增长-----以中国一家民营汽车企业为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Based on a case study of a privately-owned automobile enterprise (Geely Holding Group) in China, this study aims at exploring the interactions between institutional environment, local government and individual enterprises, as well as answering these two questions: Under an ambiguous institutional environment, (1) how can the private automobile enterprise deal with various institutional barriers and be able to survive and develop? (2) what role does local government play in this process? Informed by the work of Victor Nee, here in this thesis I put forward an integrated theoretical framework of institutions, local government, enterprises and social network in order to analyze the issues raised above. Qualitative research methods, such as participant observation, in-depth interview and archival research, were employed to collect data in the field.;It is found that institutional ambiguity is not only an obstacle but also an opportunity for organizational growth. Institutional ambiguity may create grey zones in the economic fields, where enterprises have chances to break through the administrative barriers with the help of local government. Economic and technical barriers can be partially lowered by administrative barriers. On the other hand, institutional ambiguity does increase the indeterminacy of economic actions; so the enterprises incline to rely on social network and establish legitimacy to reduce the risk.;As the economic reform deepened, private sector became the major force in the industrial expansion and collective sector diminished dramatically. Previous researches on the role of local government have been challenged. Instead of "local government as industrial firms" put forward by Andrew Walder, this dissertation proposes a new explanation "local government as agents". Local government has withdrawn from the direct intervention in firms' internal management. It turns to offer public services, as well as help firms to achieve institutional innovation and obtain scarce institutional resources. The firms will pay back to the local government in the forms of tax and other non-financial income. There are mutual selections between "agents" and "star" firms. Horizontal competitions between different governments always exist, and the "star" firms make use of these competitions to bargain with government to obtain more favorable policies.;Institutional ambiguity increases the cost of implementing rules and regulations on the local level, which makes local government more powerful in explaining and executing policies. Thus, local government has many chances to "filter" or "purify" institutional factors which are inconsistent with local interests, and share the profit with enterprises in its jurisdiction by helping them break through the institutional barriers. Based on the interaction between institution, local government and enterprises, cooperative alliance between enterprises and local government has been established, while the relationship between the central and local governments is covered non-cooperative.
机译：基于对中国一家私营汽车企业（吉利控股集团）的案例研究，本研究旨在探索制度环境，地方政府与个体企业之间的互动，并回答以下两个问题：在一个模棱两可的制度环境下，（1）私家汽车企业如何应对各种制度性障碍并能够生存和发展？ （2）地方政府在此过程中扮演什么角色？在李克强的工作指导下，本文在此提出了机构，地方政府，企业和社会网络的综合理论框架，以分析上述问题。定性研究方法，如参与者观察，深入访谈和档案研究等，被用来收集实地数据。发现机构模棱两可不仅是组织发展的障碍，也是机会。制度上的歧义可能会在经济领域中形成灰色地带，在这些灰色地带中，企业有机会在地方政府的帮助下突破行政壁垒。行政壁垒可以部分降低经济和技术壁垒。另一方面，制度上的歧义确实增加了经济行动的不确定性。因此，企业倾向于依靠社交网络并建立合法性以减少风险。随着经济改革的深入，私营部门成为工业扩张的主要力量，而集体部门则急剧减少。以前有关地方政府作用的研究受到了挑战。代替安德鲁·沃尔德提出的“地方政府作为工业企业”，本文提出了“地方政府作为代理”的新解释。地方政府已退出对公司内部管理的直接干预。它不仅提供公共服务，还帮助公司实现机构创新并获得稀缺的机构资源。这些公司将以税收和其他非金融收入的形式偿还地方政府。在“代理商”和“星级”公司之间存在相互选择。不同政府之间总是存在横向竞争，“明星”公司利用这些竞争与政府讨价还价以获得更优惠的政策。；制度上的歧义增加了在地方一级实施法规的成本，这使得地方政府更加在解释和执行策略方面功能强大。因此，地方政府有很多机会“过滤”或“净化”与当地利益不符的制度因素，并通过帮助他们突破制度障碍与当地的企业分享利润。基于机构，地方政府与企业之间的互动关系，建立了企业与地方政府之间的合作联盟，而中央与地方政府之间的关系属于非合作关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jiang, Yi.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.;Sociology Organizational.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号