• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Security community in and through practice: The power politics of Russia-NATO diplomacy.
【24h】

Security community in and through practice: The power politics of Russia-NATO diplomacy.

机译：实践中的安全社区：俄罗斯-北约外交的权力政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

How do security communities develop in and through practice? For more than forty years, security relations between Russia and NATO member states were structured by the spectre of mutual assured destruction as symbolized by thousands of nuclear missiles targeted at each other. Less than a generation after the end of the Cold War, the possibility of military confrontation between these former enemies has considerably receded. Taking inspiration from Pierre Bourdieu, this dissertation develops a theory of practice of security communities that argues that on the ground of international politics, the social fact of peace emerges when security practitioners come to debate with diplomacy---the non-violent settlement of disputes---instead of about diplomacy. It is doxa, a relationship of immediate adherence to the order of things, that makes such a peaceful practical sense possible. In the empirical analysis, the dissertation reveals an intriguing paradox in the post-Cold War Russian-Atlantic relationship. On the one hand, over the last fifteen years Russia and NATO member states have solved each and every one of their disputes, including fierce ones over the double enlargement, by nonviolent means. Such a track record of peaceful change is testimony to security-community-building processes. But on the other hand, diplomatic success was often bought at the price of a growing mistrust on the Russian side. As the Russian Great Power habitus resurfaced, hysteresis---a disconnect between players' dispositions and their positions in the game---steadily increased to the point of inconclusive symbolic power struggles over the rules of the international security game and the roles that each player should play. A decade and a half after the end of the Cold War, Russian-Atlantic relations have left the terrain of military confrontation but have yet to settle on that of mature peace. Building on several dozen interviews with Russian and NATO security practitioners, the dissertation discovers that diplomacy has become a normal though not a self-evident practice in Russian-Atlantic dealings.
机译：安全社区如何在实践中和通过实践发展？四十多年来，俄罗斯与北约成员国之间的安全关系是建立在相互保证销毁的幽灵上的，以数千枚相互瞄准的核导弹为标志。在冷战结束后不到一代的时间里，这些前敌人之间发生军事对抗的可能性已经大大减少。受到皮埃尔·布尔迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu）的启发，本论文提出了一种安全社区的实践理论，该理论认为，在国际政治基础上，当安全从业人员以外交手段进行辩论时，和平的社会事实就出现了-非暴力解决争端。 ---而不是外交。正是doxa（即紧贴事物秩序的一种关系）才使得这种和平的实践意义成为可能。在实证分析中，论文揭示了冷战后俄罗斯-大西洋关系中一个有趣的悖论。一方面，在过去的十五年中，俄罗斯和北约成员国通过非暴力手段解决了他们的每一个争端，包括在双重扩大中的激烈争端。这种和平变化的记录证明了安全社区建设进程。但是，另一方面，外交上的成功往往是以俄罗斯方面日益增加的不信任为代价的。随着俄罗斯大国习性的浮出水面，滞后现象（即玩家的性格与他们在游戏中的位置之间的脱节）逐渐上升到不确定的象征性权力在国际安全游戏规则和每个角色扮演的角色上进行斗争玩家应该玩。冷战结束十年半后，俄大西洋关系脱离了军事对抗的格局，但尚未建立成熟的和平格局。在对俄罗斯和北约安全从业人员进行数十次采访的基础上，论文发现，外交在俄罗斯-大西洋交易中已成为一种正常的做法，尽管不是不言而喻的做法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pouliot, Vincent.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 314 p.
  • 总页数 314
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号