• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Multi-criteria group decision making methods using AHP and integrated Web-based decision support systems.
【24h】

Multi-criteria group decision making methods using AHP and integrated Web-based decision support systems.

机译：使用AHP和基于Web的集成决策支持系统的多准则组决策方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This thesis explores different group decision making methods using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) applied to the multi-criteria decision making problem of selecting a preferred "site" and develops a support system for group decision making. The group members consider sites to have alternative and often conflicting uses. It is imperative for decision makers in the responsible group to have an appropriate combination of tools, computer software and decisions support systems in order to make the most preferred decisions as a group despite potential inherent conflict among members of the decision making group. To support this idea and facilitate decision making, alternative group multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) evaluation techniques are examined. These include; AHP, Weighted Sum Method (WSM), Weighted Product Method (WPM), AHP Combined Method, Group Evaluation Method, Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy AHP Combined, and Fuzzy AHP Group. A web-based comparison framework is developed as a prototype to facilitate model use. These methods are applied to the evaluation of coastal zone sites for alternate marine use including aquaculture or fish farming. Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing activities among coastal nations. At the same time, companies, researchers, and coastal communities are seeking assistance in identifying appropriate coastal zone sites for commercial fishing and aquaculture activities, habitat reserves, and marine recreation. The aquaculture case study evaluates four possible fish sites in the Grand Marian Island area of Atlantic Canada.
机译：本文运用层次分析法（AHP）探讨了选择优先“站点”的多准则决策问题的不同群体决策方法，并开发了群体决策支持系统。小组成员认为网站具有替代用途，并且经常会产生冲突。尽管决策小组成员之间可能存在内在冲突，但负责任小组中的决策者必须将工具，计算机软件和决策支持系统进行适当组合，以做出最优选的决策。为了支持该想法并促进决策，研究了替代组多标准决策（MCDM）评估技术。这些包括; AHP，加权总和法（WSM），加权乘积法（WPM），AHP合并方法，组评估方法，模糊AHP，模糊AHP合并和Fuzzy AHP组。开发了基于网络的比较框架作为原型，以方便模型使用。这些方法适用于沿海地区的评估，以替代海洋用途，包括水产养殖或养鱼。水产养殖是沿海国家中发展最快的活动之一。同时，公司，研究人员和沿海社区正在寻求帮助，以确定适合商业捕鱼和水产养殖活动，栖息地保护区和海洋休闲的沿海地区。水产养殖案例研究评估了加拿大大西洋地区大玛丽安岛地区的四个可能的鱼类地点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ozer, Ibrahim.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Ottawa (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Ottawa (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering System Science.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 168 p.
  • 总页数 168
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 系统科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号