• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >L'emergence des limites a la liberte de tester en droit quebecois: Etude socio -juridique de la production du droit.
【24h】

L'emergence des limites a la liberte de tester en droit quebecois: Etude socio -juridique de la production du droit.

机译：魁北克法律中测试自由的限制的出现：法律产生的社会法律研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Formerly the freedom of willing in Quebec was considered to be "unlimited", which meant that its scope was such that the deceased could refrain from bequeathing any property at all to his or her spouse or children. Following the introduction of legal measures on compensatory allowance and, more particularly, provisions concerning the family patrimony and the survival of the obligation of support, the scope of this freedom is no longer as all-inclusive as it once was. Although Quebeckers remain free to determine via their last wills and testaments to whom they wish to bequeath their property, henceforth their margin of freedom is limited by the preceding legislative changes which entitle the surviving spouse and immediate family of the deceased to claim to certain amounts from the succession, whatever the last will of the deceased may have been. As such, the patrimony upon which the testator now exercises freedom has ceased necessarily to be that which the deceased had control over during his or her life and marriage. It is thus no longer possible to refer to Quebeckers' "unlimited freedom" of willing.;To address these issues, this thesis is founded upon a socio-legal approach according to which it is essential to seek out the basis of the evolution of law from within the social representations valued in a society at a given time in its history. Beginning from the postulate that it is the changes in social representations that help to explain the transition from a social rationality to a legal rationality, this thesis illustrates by what actors, following which lines of logic and to what end these limitations in the freedom of willing were introduced into Quebec law. Such an approach to the evolution of the law on the basis of social representations thereby helps "to enlighten" the commonly expressed idea whereby law is a mirror image of mores.;Based upon an analysis of social representations recorded and retrieved in the discourse of different social actors, including briefs tabled before the National Assembly and proceedings in the Journal of Debates, parliamentary committees, as well as decided cases, doctrine and statutory texts, this thesis seeks to demonstrate how the changes which led to the restriction in testamentary freedom in Quebec extend far beyond perceptions evoking family and patrimony as is generally claimed. The introduction of limitations in the freedom of willing in the Civil Code seems rather to result from a compromise between the evolution in social representations regarding family relationships and the evolution in social representations regarding law, more specifically with regard to the functions of law in society and the conditions underlying the law's systemic coherence.;Lastly the analysis of this evolution makes it possible to observe that while the law governing successions was for a long time a "component" of property law, henceforth it has specifically gravitated to being a "component" of family law.;The emergence of limitations in testamentary freedom in the Civil Code invites us to question the reasons and foundations for this shift in the freedom of willing and, incidentally, the more general issue of the reform and evolution of family law in society.;Keywords: last will and testament - freedom of willing - family - patrimony - functions of law - coherence of law - social representations - evolution of law.
机译：以前，魁北克的自愿自由被认为是“无限的”，这意味着其范围如此之大，以致死者可以完全不将任何财产遗赠给其配偶或子女。在采取了有关补偿性补贴的法律措施，尤其是有关家庭遗产和抚养义务的规定之后，这种自由的范围不再像以前那样具有包容性。尽管魁北克人仍然可以通过其遗愿将遗物确定给谁，他们的自由余地因此受到先前立法变化的限制，该变化使死者的幸存配偶和直系亲属有权要求其赔偿继承人，无论死者的遗愿是什么。因此，立遗嘱人现在行使自由的遗产已经不再是死者在其一生和婚姻中所控制的遗产。因此，不再可能提及魁北克人的“无限自由”。为了解决这些问题，本论文基于社会法律方法，根据该方法，必须寻找法律演变的基础。从一个社会在其历史上的特定时间所重视的社会代表之内。从这一假设开始，正是社会表征的变化有助于解释从社会理性到法律理性的转变，本论文通过什么样的行为者，遵循哪些逻辑路线以及结束这些意愿自由的这些局限性来说明。被引入魁北克法律。这样一种基于社会表征的法律发展方法，有助于“启发”通常表达的观念，即法律是道德的镜像。；基于对在不同话语中记录和获取的社会表征的分析社会行为者，包括在国民议会上提交的摘要和辩论杂志，议会委员会的议事程序，以及已决案件，学说和法定文本，旨在寻求证明导致魁北克遗嘱自由受到限制的变化远远超出了人们通常认为的唤起家庭和遗产的观念。 《民法典》中对意愿自由的限制的引入似乎是由于在关于家庭关系的社会代表制的发展与关于法律的社会代表制的发展之间的妥协所导致的，更具体地说，是关于法律在社会和社会上的作用方面的妥协。最后，对这种演变的分析使我们有可能观察到，尽管长期以来，管辖继承的法律是财产法的“组成部分”，但从此以后，它就特别地倾向于成为财产法的“组成部分”。 《民法》中遗嘱自由的限制的出现，使我们质疑这种意愿自由发生这种转变的原因和基础，并且顺便说一句，是社会上家庭法改革和发展的更普遍问题关键字：遗嘱和遗嘱-自愿自由-家庭-遗产-法律功能-法律连贯性-社会表示法-法律的演变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morin, Christine.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 LL.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 440 p.
  • 总页数 440
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号