首页> 外文学位 >Actualizing human rights norms in distanced spaces; an analysis of the campaign to eliminate conflict diamonds and the capital market sanctions (Sudan) campaigns in the United States.
【24h】

Actualizing human rights norms in distanced spaces; an analysis of the campaign to eliminate conflict diamonds and the capital market sanctions (Sudan) campaigns in the United States.

机译:在远距离空间落实人权规范;对美国消除冲突钻石运动和苏丹的资本市场制裁运动的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, social justice activists in the United States initiated two coalition based campaigns aimed at ameliorating the violence associated with extractive industries in Angola, Sierra Leone and Sudan. The ideological diversity and the disparate interests of the coalition participants were an intriguing puzzle and part of this dissertation is an exploration of how it is that these widely diverse actors were able to collaborate and successfully run the campaigns despite their significant differences. I advance the argument that diversity of ideological subscription is no bar to coalition work in campaigns because a strategic basis for operationalization enables collaboration across ideological and interest differences.; I utilized a tripartite opportunity structure framework to analyze the campaign. Extant scholarship on social movements is predominantly state centric, but in these cases the violators or human rights were other than states i.e. corporations, rebels and warlords that operated across state boundaries and were enabled by the market. To better encapsulate the range of structural opportunities I therefore delineated institutional structures rather than just state structures. The second leg of the framework emanates from the problem of separating framing from opportunity structures. The efforts of the activists through the framing of their messages as well as their mobilizing efforts were met by the counter frames of the targets and mediated by various opportunity structures that comprised the prevailing context. Rather than simply a unidirectional frame activity from the activists, I wanted to capture the competing nature of the framing processes in the public sphere. Thirdly, although the campaigns took place during the same historical time space and were motivated by the same phenomenon of violence in extractive industries, they had divergent trajectories and different outcomes. From the investigations it was fairly clear that the economic and strategic interests within the U.S. context largely determined the campaign outcomes. I therefore utilized a geopolitical opportunity structure to complete the analytical framework.
机译:在1990年代末和2000年代初,美国的社会正义活动家发起了两次基于联盟的运动,旨在减轻与安哥拉,塞拉利昂和苏丹的采掘业有关的暴力。联盟参与者的意识形态多样性和不同利益是一个令人着迷的难题,并且本文的一部分是探讨尽管存在很大差异,但这些广泛差异的参与者如何能够协作并成功地开展竞选活动。我提出这样一个论点,即意识形态订阅的多样性并不妨碍竞选活动中的联盟工作,因为实施的战略基础可以实现跨意识形态和利益差异的合作。我利用了三方机会结构框架来分析竞选活动。现有的关于社会运动的奖学金主要以国家为中心,但在这些情况下,违反者或人权并非国家,即跨越国家边界运作并由市场推动的公司,叛乱者和军阀。因此,为了更好地概括结构性机会的范围,我描述了体制结构,而不仅仅是国家结构。框架的第二条腿源于将框架与机会结构分开的问题。目标的反框架满足了活动家通过构筑信息和动员努力所进行的努力,并由构成普遍背景的各种机会结构进行了调解。我不仅希望活动家进行单向框架活动,还想捕捉公共领域中框架过程的竞争性质。第三,尽管这些运动是在相同的历史时空内进行的,并且受到采掘业中相同的暴力现象的推动,但它们的发展轨迹不同,结果也不同。从调查中可以很清楚地看出,在美国范围内的经济和战略利益在很大程度上决定了竞选结果。因此,我利用地缘政治机会结构来完成分析框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    Muvingi, Ismael James.;

  • 作者单位

    George Mason University.;

  • 授予单位 George Mason University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Sociology Organizational.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 388 p.
  • 总页数 388
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号