• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Symbolic Judgments or Judging Symbols: Fair Labelling and the Dilemma of Prosecuting Gender-Based Crimes under the Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals.
【24h】

Symbolic Judgments or Judging Symbols: Fair Labelling and the Dilemma of Prosecuting Gender-Based Crimes under the Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals.

机译：象征性判决或审判性符号：公平标签和根据国际刑事法庭法规起诉基于性别的犯罪的困境。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This thesis argues that the abstractness and lack of accurate description and labelling of gender-based crimes in the statutory laws of the international criminal tribunals and courts infringe the principle of fair labelling, lead to inconsistent verdicts and punishments, and cause inadequate prosecution of such crimes. Accordingly, this inquiry deals with gender-based crimes as a case study and with fair labelling as a legal principle and a theoretical framework.;This analysis consists of four interrelated chapters, including an introduction and a conclusion. The introductory chapter begins by outlining the central focus and theoretical legal framework that guides my investigation and analysis of the dilemma of prosecuting gender-based crimes in the ad hoc international criminal tribunals and the ICC. As well, it discusses fair labelling, which has become a recognized legal principle in criminal law over the past three decades. Furthermore, this chapter provides justifications for the inquiry by elucidating why an analysis of the failure of the international criminal tribunals to adequately prosecute gender-based crimes in the light of the principle of fair labelling is of critical importance.;Chapter two concentrates on fair labelling as a common legal principle and a legal framework that guides my work. After examining the intellectual development of the principle of fair labelling, elucidating its scope and justification, and illustrating its applicability to gender-based crimes, this chapter analyzes its relation to other criminal law principles and concepts, including nullum crimen sine lege; mens rea; proportionality; multiple wrongdoing; the moral or socio-pedagogical influence of punishment; and the doctrine of joint criminal enterprise (JCE). It also looks into the landscape of international gender justice and examines the codification of gender-based crimes as crimes against humanity and war crimes under the statutory laws of the international criminal tribunals and in light of the principle of fair labelling.;Chapter three addresses the dilemma of prosecuting gender-based crimes in the international criminal tribunals. It starts by scrutinizing feminist legal literature and tracing its controversial arguments relating to the prosecution of gender-based crimes in these supranational judicial bodies. Then it moves on to examine the case law of the international criminal tribunals and to analyse, in the light of the principle of fair labelling, their shortcomings related to major cases of gender-based crimes. In this connection, it discusses violations of other principles and concepts, particularly the offender's right to fair warning or maximum certainty, the right to fair trial without due delay, and the right to fair sentencing.;This topic is both critical and timely, and contributes to the existing scholarship in many different ways. This study is the first legal analysis to focus on the dilemma of prosecuting and punishing wartime gender-based crimes in the statutory laws of the international criminal tribunals and the ICC with reference to the principle of fair labelling. Moreover, this inquiry emphasises that applying the principle of fair labelling to wartime gender-based crimes would help the tribunals in delivering fair judgements and breaking the cycle of impunity for these crimes. Finally, this thesis presents a modest model of coherent legal analysis for reconceptualizing, defining, and labelling gender-based crimes that would assist the tribunals in their efforts to reformulate and amend their basic laws, a substantial step towards effectively identifying and prosecuting gender-based crimes.;Finally, after summarising the main findings of this inquiry, chapter four concludes by confirming that the lack of accurate description and labelling of gender-based crimes in the statutory laws of the international criminal tribunals and courts violate the principle of fair labelling, lead to inconsistent verdicts and punishments, and inadequate prosecution of such crimes. Moreover, it underlines the options for reform within the statutory laws of these judicial bodies in the light of the principle of fair labelling. This reform would help the tribunals and the ICC to eliminate inconsistent prosecutions and overcome shortcomings in addressing gender-based crimes within their jurisprudence.
机译：本论文认为，国际刑事法庭和法院成文法中基于性别的犯罪的抽象性和缺乏准确的描述和标记，违反了公平标记的原则，导致判决和处罚不一致，并导致对此类犯罪的起诉不足。因此，本次调查以案例研究为基础，以性别为基础的犯罪，以公平标签为法律原则和理论框架。；该分析包括四个相互关联的章节，包括引言和结论。介绍性章节从概述中心重点和理论法律框架开始，这些指导我对特设国际刑事法庭和国际刑事法院起诉基于性别的犯罪的困境进行调查和分析。此外，它还讨论了公平标签，在过去的三十年中，公平标签已成为刑法中公认的法律原则。此外，本章通过阐明为什么根据公平标签原则对国际刑事法庭未能适当起诉基于性别的犯罪进行分析，具有至关重要的意义，为本次调查提供了依据。第二章着重于公平标签作为指导我工作的共同法律原则和法律框架。在考察了公平标签原则的理智发展，阐明其范围和合理性并说明了其适用于基于性别的犯罪之后，本章分析了其与其他刑法原则和概念的关系，其中包括无罪犯罪。精神病相称性多次不法行为；惩罚的道德或社会教育影响；以及共同犯罪企业学说（JCE）。它还根据国际刑事法庭的成文法并根据公平标签的原则，考察了国际性别司法的情况，并审查了将基于性别的犯罪编纂为危害人类罪和战争罪的行为。第三章讨论了国际刑事法庭起诉基于性别的犯罪的两难境地。首先是对女性主义法律文献进行审查，并在这些超国家司法机构中追踪其与起诉基于性别的犯罪有关的有争议的论点。然后，它继续审查国际刑事法庭的判例法，并根据公平标签的原则分析它们与基于性别的犯罪大案有关的缺点。在这方面，它讨论了违反其他原则和概念的情况，特别是罪犯的获得公正警告或最大确定性的权利，没有受到适当拖延的公正审判的权利以及公正判刑的权利。通过许多不同方式为现有奖学金做出贡献。这项研究是第一个针对国际刑事法庭和国际刑事法院成文法中起诉和惩治战时基于性别的犯罪的两难困境的法律分析。此外，这项调查强调，将公平标签原则适用于战时基于性别的犯罪，将有助于法庭作出公正的判决，并打破对这些犯罪有罪不罚的现象。最后，本文提出了一种适度的，连贯的法律分析模型，用于重新概念化，定义和标记基于性别的犯罪，这将有助于法庭重新制定和修改其基本法律，这是朝着有效地识别和起诉基于性别的犯罪迈出的重要一步最后，在总结了本次调查的主要结论之后，第四章得出结论，确认国际刑事法庭和法院的成文法中缺乏对性别犯罪的准确描述和标记，这违反了公平标记的原则，导致对判决和处罚的不一致，以及对此类罪行的起诉不足。此外，它强调了根据公平标签原则在这些司法机构的成文法范围内进行改革的选择。这项改革将有助于法庭和国际刑事法院消除诉讼中的不一致之处，并克服在其判例范围内处理基于性别的犯罪的缺点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zawati, Hilmi Mohammad Ahmad.;

  • 作者单位

    McGill University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McGill University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Womens Studies.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 D.C.L.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 335 p.
  • 总页数 335
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号