• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Qualitative Case Study of the Transition to Regulation of Forensic Science in Texas.
【24h】

Qualitative Case Study of the Transition to Regulation of Forensic Science in Texas.

机译：德克萨斯州司法科学监管过渡的定性案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Currently the forensic science community has few oversight models to follow and states are left to develop forensic science regulation without knowledge of potential problems, proven successes, or benefits of lessons learned from stakeholders (regulatory agency, laboratory personnel, law enforcement, and judicial system). This qualitative instrumental case study examined, in depth, Texas's transition to forensic science oversight using the lived experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders in the regulation process, namely those who had oversight of the regulation (Texas Forensic Science Commission), those who were regulated (laboratory personnel), and those who potentially benefit from regulation (law enforcement and the judicial system). The goal was to fully explore the regulatory process achieved by Texas and the perceived problems, successes, and lessons learned from the stakeholders' points of view regarding the transition to regulation. Implementing the data source triangulation methodology, in which the three different viewpoints are the data sources, allowed for commonalities and trends to be identified. The patterns were identified through coding the interview question responses then the different stakeholder groups were compared to one another to identify larger trends. Knowing how these three stakeholder groups perceived the transition to regulation assisted in identifying the successes and pitfalls of Texas's transition to forensic science regulation; which, in turn, allowed for lessons learned and a model of regulation of to be developed. The findings revealed that focusing on stakeholder involvement, creating an environment of learning, and tailoring policing to the stakeholders is a necessity in regulation. Texas was able to incorporate these aspects of the theory of regulation by gaining the trust of the stakeholders, ultimately, moving the forensic science discipline in a positive direction. Recommendations include expanding the study to include a larger sample population within Texas and in states that have also implemented regulation. Including states that have failed, in addition to those that have succeeded, will either further confirm findings related to the successes, pitfalls, and lessons learned or bring to light other ones.
机译：目前，法证科学界几乎没有可以遵循的监督模型，并且在缺乏对潜在问题，已证明的成功或从利益相关者（监管机构，实验室人员，执法机构和司法系统）汲取的教训的知识的情况下，各国只能制定法证科学法规。 。这项定性的工具案例研究使用监管过程中主要利益相关者的经验和观点深入研究了德克萨斯州向法医科学监督的过渡，这些利益相关者在监管过程中是负责监管的人（德州法医科学委员会），在监管者中是受监管的（实验室人员）以及可能从法规中受益的人员（执法和司法系统）。目的是全面探索德克萨斯州实现的监管流程以及从利益相关者对监管过渡的观点中发现的问题，成功和经验教训。实施数据源三角测量方法，其中三个不同的观点是数据源，从而可以确定共性和趋势。通过对访谈问题的回答进行编码来确定模式，然后将不同的利益相关者群体进行比较以识别更大的趋势。了解这三个利益相关者团体如何看待向法规的过渡有助于确定德克萨斯州向法医科学法规过渡的成功和陷阱；反过来，这也允许吸取经验教训并制定监管模式。调查结果表明，关注利益相关者的参与，创造学习环境以及为利益相关者量身定制治安是监管的必要条件。德州能够通过赢得利益相关者的信任，从而将监管理论的这些方面纳入其中，最终使法医科学学科朝着积极的方向发展。建议包括扩大研究范围，以包括得克萨斯州以及也已实施法规的州的更大样本人群。除了已经成功的国家之外，包括已经失败的国家，将进一步确认与成功，陷阱和经验教训相关的发现，或者发现其他问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fontaine, Elizabeth K.;

  • 作者单位

    Northcentral University.;

  • 授予单位 Northcentral University.;
  • 学科 Business administration.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号