• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >From backyard revolution to backyard reaction: Protest, development, and the anti-politics machine in Cleveland, 1975--2005.
【24h】

From backyard revolution to backyard reaction: Protest, development, and the anti-politics machine in Cleveland, 1975--2005.

机译：从后院革命到后院反应：1975--2005年在克利夫兰的抗议，发展和反政治机器。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The last twenty-five years have witnessed the construction of a new arrangement for the production of housing in urban areas with depressed real estate markets. This arrangement has been widely celebrated both for its effectiveness in reviving poor neighborhoods and its demonstration of the ability of civil society organizations and public-private partnerships to do what the state cannot. This dissertation objectifies and analyzes these claims in two ways. First, it situates the development of this system in a broader history of civil society and political contestation in Cleveland. Situating the field of community development in this way reveals that the success of the arrangement is premised upon a narrowing of possibility in the civil society of the city and is, in fact, dependent upon the marginalization of neighborhood-based politics. In this sense, community development has come to operate as an "anti-politics machine". Second, rather than focusing on a few exemplary organizations, this dissertation examines the field of community development as a whole and finds that it is split between two competing logics. On the one hand are organizations that use housing development in support of the electoral operations of ward-based politicians. On the other are organizations that use housing development to further the efforts of local growth-oriented elites to expand real estate values and attract professionals back into the city.
机译：在过去的25年中，目睹了房地产市场低迷的城市住房生产新安排的建立。这项安排因其在贫困地区的复兴中的效力以及其民间社会组织和公私伙伴关系的能力表现出国家无法做到的能力而广受赞誉。本文以两种方式对这些主张进行了客观化和分析。首先，它在克利夫兰的更广泛的公民社会和政治斗争的历史中确立了这一制度的发展。以这种方式来定位社区发展领域表明，这种安排的成功是基于城市公民社会范围内可能性的缩小，实际上，这取决于基于邻里的政治的边缘化。从这个意义上讲，社区发展已成为一种“反政治机器”。其次，本文没有关注一些示范性组织，而是从整体上考察了社区发展领域，并发现社区发展领域被划分为两种相互竞争的逻辑。一方面是利用住房开发来支持基于病房的政客的选举活动的组织。另一方面是利用住房开发来进一步促进当地以增长为导向的精英们扩大房地产价值并吸引专业人士回城的组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号