• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Comparative study of int'l, American and China OPLRs: To establish China comprehensive OPLR.
【24h】

Comparative study of int'l, American and China OPLRs: To establish China comprehensive OPLR.

机译：国际，美国和中国OPLR的比较研究：建立中国全面的OPLR。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this dissertation, the author has comparatively studied the international OPLR, the American OPLR and the China OPLR. Specifically, the comparative study covers key terms, channeling rule, liability rule, admissible damages, defenses, limitation of liability, insurance and financial responsibility, oil pollution liability fund, subrogation, recourse action, procedures for asserting claims, limitation periods and judicial jurisdiction of all three OPLRs.; By comparative study, the author realizes that the primary purpose of the international OPLR is to guarantee the full compensation for oil pollution damage. To facilitate other international conventions for purpose of marine environmental protection by creating incentives for a shipowner to take precautions in preventing oil pollution from happening is the secondary purpose of the international OPLR. Variously, the primary purpose of the American OPLR is to create incentives for all of the responsible party of a ship, a facility or deepwater port to take positive measures in preventing an oil pollution incident from happening or alleviating oil pollution damage where an oil pollution incident occurred. To guarantee full compensation for oil pollution damage and removal costs is only the secondary purpose of the American OPLR.; Currently, the China OPLR is kind of two-fold path regime, i.e. the China OPLR for the foreign-related oil pollution situation and the China OPLR for the purely domestic oil pollution situation, with a poorly crafted and piecemeal condition. Given the facts that the fast growth of the carriage of cruel oil by sea in the waters of China, the threat of a grave oil pollution discharge, and the national policy of "prevention first and control pollution in comprehensive manner," China should improve its existing OPLR to effectuate the "prevention first" goal and then guarantee the full compensation.; As one of achievements of this dissertation, the author has drafted a COPL for China.
机译：本文对国际OPLR，美国OPLR和中国OPLR进行了比较研究。具体而言，比较研究涵盖关键术语，渠道规则，责任规则，可容许的损害赔偿，抗辩，责任限制，保险和财务责任，油污责任基金，代位，求偿行动，主张权利的程序，时效期限和司法管辖权所有三个OPLR。通过比较研究，作者认识到国际OPLR的主要目的是保证对油污损害的全部赔偿。通过鼓励船东采取预防措施防止油污的发生，从而促进其他国际公约以实现海洋环境保护，是国际OPLR的次要目标。不同地，美国OPLR的主要目的是激励船舶，设施或深水港的所有责任方采取积极措施，防止发生油污事件或减轻发生油污事件的油污损害发生了。确保对油污损害和清除成本进行全额赔偿仅是美国OPLR的次要目的。目前，中国的OPLR是一种双重途径的制度，即中国OPLR用于处理涉外石油污染情况，而中国OPLR则用于处理纯国内油污情况，且条件不佳且零碎。鉴于中国水域海上残油运输的快速增长，严重的油污排放威胁以及国家“全面预防和控制污染”的政策，中国应改善其环境。现有的OPLR实现“预防第一”的目标，然后保证全额赔偿。作为本论文的成就之一，作者为中国起草了一份COPL。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shan, Hongjun.;

  • 作者单位

    Tulane University.;

  • 授予单位 Tulane University.;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 497 p.
  • 总页数 497
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;国际法;环境科学基础理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号