• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The social functions and ritual significance of jewelry in the Iron Age II Southern Levant.
【24h】

The social functions and ritual significance of jewelry in the Iron Age II Southern Levant.

机译：铁器时代二南黎凡特的珠宝的社会功能和仪式意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation examines excavated jewelry from the Iron Age II Southern Levant, especially the kingdoms of Israel and Judah between 850-580 BCE. This assemblage allows for the identification of social functions of the jewelry in order to give scholars greater insight into an artifact class that has been little studied by archaeologists. Separating different social functions, and finding the criteria that made some jewelry objects apotropaic is also a necessary step in identifying ancient amulets, that being just one of the several possible functions of jewelry.;Social functions are addressed by examining various characteristics of the jewelry found in excavations, including colors and materials used, and the terminology used for jewelry and its traits in the Hebrew Bible. Anthropological theory about dress and ornament is then applied to the corpus, focusing on visibility of jewelry, or what another person would be able to see in a social situation. This is useful for whole pieces such as bangles, earrings, and rings, but less so for jewelry elements such as beads, pendants, scarabs, scaraboids, and seals, which are examined together with the ancient texts and in terms of their individual characteristics.;Color turned out to be the primary criteria for the choices of materials for beads, pendants, and glyptic objects. The most common colors of stone and synthetic jewelry materials were the same colors of cloth that were called for in ritual settings in the Hebrew Bible, suggesting that these colors were ritually powerful, and that the jewelry was as well. It is not clear whether they were powerful because they were used in the Temple, or vice versa, but the correlation is clear.;Color was not the most important trait of earrings, nose rings, bangles, and rings, which were overwhelmingly made of metal. In those cases, size, location of wear, and available wealth appeared to be more important. These objects could, at a minimum, convey information on wealth, social status, and marital status to a viewer.
机译：本文研究了从铁器时代II黎凡特南部出土的珠宝，尤其是公元前850-580年之间的以色列和犹大王国。这种组合可以确定珠宝的社会功能，从而使学者们可以更好地了解考古学家很少研究的人工制品。分离不同的社会功能，并找到使某些珠宝物品成为假肢的标准，这也是识别古代护身符的必要步骤，因为这只是珠宝的几种可能功能之一。社会功能通过检查发现的珠宝的各种特征来解决。在挖掘中使用，包括所用的颜色和材料，以及希伯来圣经中用于珠宝及其特质的术语。然后将有关服饰和装饰品的人类学理论应用于语料库，重点是珠宝的可见性，或他人在社交场合下可以看到的东西。这对于整件物品（例如手镯，耳环和戒指）很有用，但对诸如珠子，吊坠，圣甲虫，圣甲虫和印章之类的珠宝元素则没有多大帮助，这些元素要与远古文字一起进行检查，并要根据其个性特征进行研究。 ；颜色是选择珠子，吊坠和雕饰材料的主要标准。石头和人造珠宝材料最常见的颜色是希伯来圣经在仪式环境中所要求的布料颜色，这表明这些颜色在仪式上很有效，珠宝也是如此。目前尚不清楚它们是否强大，是因为它们曾在圣殿中使用过，反之亦然，但相关性很明显。颜色不是耳环，鼻环，手镯和戒指的最重要特征，它们绝大多数由金属。在这些情况下，尺寸，穿着位置和可用财富似乎更为重要。这些对象至少可以向观看者传达有关财富，社会地位和婚姻状况的信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Limmer, Abigail Susan.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Religion Biblical Studies.;Anthropology Archaeology.;History Ancient.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 743 p.
  • 总页数 743
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号