• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Work useful to religion and the humanities: A history of the development of the comparative method in religion from Bartolome Las Casas to Edward Burnett Tylor (Bernardino de Sahagun, Jose de Acosta, Joseph Lafitau).
【24h】

Work useful to religion and the humanities: A history of the development of the comparative method in religion from Bartolome Las Casas to Edward Burnett Tylor (Bernardino de Sahagun, Jose de Acosta, Joseph Lafitau).

机译：对宗教和人文科学有用的工作：从巴托洛梅·拉斯·卡萨斯（Bartolome Las Casas）到爱德华·伯内特·泰勒（Edward Burnett Tylor）（贝纳尔迪诺·德·萨哈贡，何塞·德·阿科斯塔，约瑟夫·拉菲托）发展宗教比较方法的历史。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

My dissertation outlines a new approach to the history of comparison by tracing its development from the first moments of contact with the New World through the recognized origin of the discipline of anthropology in the nineteenth-century. In this dissertation, I trace the lineage of the comparative study of religion from Bartolome Las Casas through Bernardino de Sahagun, Jose de Acosta and Joseph Lafitau to the recognized originator of that method, Edward Burnett Tylor. The comparisons made by Las Casas, Sahagun and Acosta have been used by missionaries and anthropologists alike in order to understand European history as well Amerindian culture and life. One such missionary, Joseph Lafitau, pre-figures Tylor's comparative method. Lafitau argued understanding Amerindian practices and beliefs allowed him to better understand pre-Christian European practices and beliefs and to see their development. Similarly, one hundred years later Tylor argued previous stages of European history could be seen in what he called "primitive" religion and in that way he parallels Lafitau's idea that indigenous peoples provide a way of seeing previous stages of human history. However, Tylor argued that Catholic missionaries created the similarities they saw when they constructed their comparisons between Europeans and indigenous peoples and he did not need to create such similarities because his method of identifying 'survivals' from previous periods of human history demonstrated the connections between different stages of religious evolution. The similarities and differences between Lafitau and Tylor demonstrates a change of emphasis on the role of religion in order to understand Europeans and indigenous peoples but not a sharp break in either comparative method or explanation. The historical trajectory I have outlined from Las Casas to Tylor suggests that the Enlightenment does not mark a sharp break in the understanding of comparative religion. Instead, my dissertation demonstrates the continuity of the comparative method from the discovery of the New World through the nineteenth-century.
机译：我的论文概述了比较历史的一种新方法，通过追溯它从与新世界接​​触的最初时刻到十九世纪人类学学科公认的起源来追踪它的发展。在这篇论文中，我追溯了从巴托洛梅·拉斯·卡萨斯（Bartolome Las Casas）到贝纳迪诺·萨哈根（Bernardino de Sahagun），何塞·德·阿科斯塔（Jose de Acosta）和约瑟夫·拉菲托（Joseph Lafitau）的宗教比较研究的沿革，直到该方法的公认创始人爱德华·伯内特·泰勒（Edward Burnett Tylor）。传教士和人类学家都使用Las Casas，Sahagun和Acosta所做的比较，以了解欧洲历史以及美洲印第安人的文化和生活。一位这样的传教士约瑟夫·拉菲托（Joseph Lafitau）率先采用了泰勒的比较方法。拉菲陶（Lafitau）认为，了解美洲印第安人的行为和信念可以使他更好地了解基督教之前的欧洲行为和信念，并了解其发展。同样，一百年后的泰勒认为，欧洲历史的前几个阶段可以从他所谓的“原始”宗教中看到，并且以此方式，他与拉菲托关于土著人民提供了一种看待人类历史的前途的方式相提并论。然而，泰勒认为，天主教传教士创造了他们在欧洲人和土著人民之间进行比较时所看到的相似之处，而他并没有必要建立这样的相似之处，因为他从人类历史上的早期阶段确定“幸存者”的方法表明了不同人群之间的联系。宗教发展的各个阶段。拉菲陶和泰勒之间的异同表明，为了理解欧洲人和土著人民，人们对宗教角色的重视程度发生了变化，但在比较方法或解释上并未出现重大突破。我从拉斯卡萨斯（Las Casas）到泰勒（Tylor）概述的历史轨迹表明，启蒙运动并没有标志着对比较宗教的理解上的重大突破。相反，我的论文证明了从发现新世界到19世纪，比较方法的连续性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ammon, Laura.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Religion History of.; Anthropology Cultural.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教史、宗教地理;人类学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号