• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >An analysis of the implementation of the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation in the middle schools involved in the Abbeville, South Carolina, school district lawsuit.
【24h】

An analysis of the implementation of the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation in the middle schools involved in the Abbeville, South Carolina, school district lawsuit.

机译：南卡罗来纳州反欺凌立法在参与南卡罗来纳州阿比维尔学区诉讼的中学中的执行情况分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study presents an analysis of the anti-bullying policies of 24 South Carolina middle schools that were involved in the Abbeville lawsuit. These schools sued the state of South Carolina alleging that the school finding system was inadequate. The schools are plagued with numerous problems including being among the lowest performing in the state, dilapidated buildings, underpaid teachers, high staff turn-over rate, and high levels of poverty. Along with the problems associated with inadequate funding, bullying in these schools is another barrier that must be conquered to achieve academic success. South Carolina implemented its anti-bullying legislation in 2006 and placed a mandate on each school district to implement an anti-bullying policy by January 1, 2007.;Data for this study were collected using a self-administered 30-item questionnaire (see Appendix A) developed by the researcher. The questionnaires were sent to the school principals with instructions requesting that the survey be completed by the individual responsible for receiving and investigating complaints of bullying. The instrument was piloted on a mixed group of educators at a bullying conference. The researcher mailed out 31 questionnaires, of which 26 were returned. Two of the 26 were eliminated due to insufficient responses.;An adoption of Fowler's (2009) four criteria for successful policy implementation (highly successful, relatively successful, relatively unsuccessful, and unsuccessful) provided the framework for the study.;The researcher's methodology included the use of percentages and standard deviation to analyze the data. Three research questions were established for the purpose of evaluating the level of success each of the 24 middle schools achieved in implementing the state's anti-bullying policy.;Research question one inquired about the extent in which the middle schools involved in the Abbeville lawsuit were implementing the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation. The findings for research question one indicated that the majority (62.5%) of the middle schools represented in the Abbeville lawsuit are unsuccessfully implementing the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation. When examining the total score response and the implementation rating that corresponded with the total scores in chart 5 (located in Chapter IV), it is evident that the schools' anti-bullying policy implementation does not align with the implementation of the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation.;Relative to research question two, regarding the degree to which the schools' policy implementation was successful, 3 (12.5%) of the 24 schools are unsuccessfully implementing their anti-bullying policy, 12 (50%) are relatively unsuccessfully implementing their policy, 5 (20.8%) relatively successful and four (16.7%) are highly successfully implementing their policy according to the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation. Overall, the majority (62.5%) of the schools are not successfully implementing their anti-bullying policy according to the modifications of Fowler's (2009) successful criteria categories.;Finally, research question three, which related to the schools' perception of their level of implementation, determined that there is a degree of difference in how the respondents' rated their schools based on the actual rating of the survey score results. All of the respondents rated their school as either in the relatively or highly successful categories. Schools R and V were the only schools that had a rating that corresponded with the actual survey score rating. This indicates that 91.7% of the respondents' assessment regarding the implementation of their anti-bullying policy is imprecise.;The findings report that the majority (62.5%) of the schools involved in the Abbeville lawsuit are not successfully implementing their anti-bullying policy according to the South Carolina anti-bullying legislation.;KEY WORDS. Bullying, Bullycide, School Safety, Anti-bullying, South Carolina Anti-bullying Legislation
机译：这项研究对参与Abbeville诉讼的南卡罗来纳州24所中学的反欺凌政策进行了分析。这些学校起诉南卡罗来纳州，指控学校发现系统不完善。这些学校受到许多问题困扰，其中包括该州表现最差的建筑物，残旧的建筑物，教师薪水不足，人员流失率高以及贫困程度高。除了与资金不足有关的问题外，在这些学校中欺负是要取得学术成功必须克服的另一障碍。南卡罗来纳州于2006年实施了反欺凌立法，并责成每个学区在2007年1月1日之前实施反欺凌政策。本研究的数据是使用自行管理的30个项目的调查表收集的（请参阅附录） A）由研究人员开发。问卷已发送给学校校长，并附有指示，要求负责接收和调查欺凌投诉的个人完成调查。在一次欺凌会议上，该仪器是由一群混合的教育者试用的。研究人员寄出31份问卷，其中26份被退回。由于回应不足，取消了26项中的2项; Fowler（2009年）采用成功实施政策的四个标准（高度成功，相对成功，相对不成功和不成功）为研究提供了框架;研究人员的方法包括使用百分比和标准偏差来分析数据。建立了三个研究问题，以评估24所中学在实施国家反欺凌政策方面所取得的成功水平。一项研究问题询问涉及Abbeville诉讼的中学在多大程度上实施南卡罗来纳州的反欺凌立法。研究问题一的调查结果表明，阿贝维尔诉讼中代表的大多数中学（62.5％）没有成功实施南卡罗来纳州的反欺凌立法。当检查与表5（位于第IV章）中的总得分相对应的总得分响应和实施评级时，很明显，学校的反欺凌政策实施与南卡罗来纳州的反欺凌政策的实施不符相对于研究问题二，关于学校政策实施成功的程度，24所学校中有3所（12.5％）未能成功实施反欺凌政策，12所学校（50％）则未能成功实施根据南卡罗来纳州的反欺凌立法，他们的政策中有5个（20.8％）相对成功，四个（16.7％）都非常成功地实施了他们的政策。总体而言，根据福勒（2009）成功标准类别的修改，大多数学校（62.5％）未能成功实施反欺凌政策。最后，研究问题三，与学校对自己水平的看法有关在实施过程中，根据调查得分结果的实际评分，确定受访者对学校的评分存在一定程度的差异。所有受访者都将他们的学校评为相对或非常成功的类别。 R和V学校是唯一具有与实际调查分数评分相对应的评分的学校。这表明91.7％的受访者对他们的反欺凌政策的执行情况的评估是不准确的。;调查结果报告，参与Abbeville诉讼的大多数学校（62.5％）未能成功实施他们的反欺凌政策根据南卡罗来纳州的反欺凌立法。欺凌，欺凌，学校安全，反欺凌，南卡罗来纳州反欺凌立法

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith-Canty, Vanessa.;

  • 作者单位

    South Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 South Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Education Finance.;Law.;Education Middle School.;Education Guidance and Counseling.;Education Policy.;Education School Administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 142 p.
  • 总页数 142
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号