• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Paul-Apollos relationship and Paul's stance toward Greco -Roman rhetoric: An exegetical and socio-historical study of 1 Corinthians 1--4.
【24h】

The Paul-Apollos relationship and Paul's stance toward Greco -Roman rhetoric: An exegetical and socio-historical study of 1 Corinthians 1--4.

机译：保罗-阿波洛斯（Paul-Apollos）关系和保罗对希腊-罗马修辞学的立场：对1科林斯人1--4的解释和社会历史研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Chapter 1 explains some of the methodological and hermeneutical issues that are foundational to the study. Two in particular are discussed: word studies and background studies.;Chapter 2 presents a detailed exegesis of the text of 1 Corinthians 1-4. The purpose of the exegesis is to discern the literary and thematic unity of this rhetorical unit. It is shown that Paul constructed his argument against dissensions by first addressing the issue of wisdom.;Chapter 3 concludes that the background of wisdom is that of Greco-Roman rhetoric. It was the high estimation of it that led to the dissensions in the Corinthian church. Complementary to the sophistic background, the social background is proven to shed light on the partisan spirit. In this respect, the names that most likely were in danger of being perceived in competitive terms were those of Paul and Apollos. The Corinthians, it is argued, preferred one teacher against the other based on their rhetorical eloquence as well as the possibilities that these teachers offered them in regard to social status and honor enhancement.;Chapter 4 surveys the different views on Paul's stance toward rhetoric. It is concluded that Paul rejected the dynamic of sophistic rhetoric both in public speech as well as in writing. In this regard, the supposed apologetic character of 1 Corinthian 1-4 is questioned.;Chapter 5 draws some implications concerning the role of Apollos in the dissensions and concludes that Paul and Apollos fulfilled complementary rather than competing roles in the Corinthian congregation. Thus Apollos should be viewed as functioning in a positive and not polemical way in 1 Corinthians 1-4.
机译：第1章介绍了一些基础的方法论和解释学问题。特别讨论了两个：单词研究和背景研究。；第二章详细介绍了哥林多前书1-4的经文。训ege的目的是辨别该修辞单元的文学和主题统一。结果表明，保罗首先通过解决智慧问题来构建反对纷争的论点。第三章得出结论，智慧的背景是希腊罗马修辞的背景。正是对它的高估导致了科林斯式教堂的分歧。与复杂的背景相辅相成，事实证明，社会背景为党派精神提供了启示。在这方面，最有可能以竞争性方式被感知的名字是保罗和阿波罗的名字。有人认为，哥林多人基于他们的口才和他们在社会地位和荣誉提升方面为他们提供的可能性，偏向于一位老师而不是另一位老师;第四章调查了关于保罗的修辞立场的不同观点。结论是，保罗在公开演讲和写作中都拒绝了复杂的修辞学。在这一点上，人们质疑了哥林多前书1-4的所谓的道歉特征。第5章对阿波罗在分歧中的作用提出了一些启示，并得出结论，保罗和阿波罗在哥林多会众中扮演的是互补而不是竞争的角色。因此，在1 Corinthians 1-4中，应将Apollos视为积极而不是辩论的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mihaila, Corin.;

  • 作者单位

    Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary.;

  • 授予单位 Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary.;
  • 学科 Religion Biblical Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 420 p.
  • 总页数 420
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号