• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The value of security vs. the security of values: The relationship between the rights of the minority and the security of the majority in Israel.
【24h】

The value of security vs. the security of values: The relationship between the rights of the minority and the security of the majority in Israel.

机译：安全的价值与价值的安全：以色列的少数人权利与多数人安全之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation examines the rise in the legal discrimination of the Palestinian Israelis since the eruption of al-Aqsa intifada in September 2000. The objective of the study was to explain the reasons for this rise and its implication of the majority-minority relations in Israel.;The study finds that there has been a rise in the legal discrimination of Palestinian Israelis since September 2000 with the introduction of new legislation, which seeks to further marginalize this minority. The legal policies adopted in Israel since September 2000 have been anchored in the interest of national security. The Israeli policy-maker and the security community views the Palestinian minority as posing a direct threat to the security of the Jewish majority and thus, policies which seek to impose political and legal limitation on the Palestinian minority in Israel are justified.;Contrary to the assumptions made by the Israeli policy maker, this study finds that it is the rise in the legal discrimination of the Palestinian minority and its exclusion from the Israeli polity, which contributes to the rise in the use of political violence by that minority against the state. Relying on prospect theory and relative deprivation theory the study develops a model employing six criteria to indicate the likelihood of the eruption of internal violence in the Israeli case study.;The findings indicate that the Palestinian minority may be comparing its current legal status to its previous one, during the Oslo Peace process, in which the minority had experienced improvement in its status within the State. The use of the Oslo Peace Process period as a reference point results in the minority viewing its current situation as an unjust loss (in legal status) giving rise to the likelihood of the use of political violence against the state to gain those perceived losses.;The findings show that as the level of violence in the external Israeli-Palestinian conflict rises, there is a cyclical pattern in which the pre-existing sense of apprehension and mistrust of the Palestinian-Arab minority results in their alienation and disaffection through the introduction of discriminatory legislation that leads few to commit acts against the states, which in turn reinforces the perception of threat and legitimizes the discrimination.
机译：本文探讨了自2000年9月阿克萨起义爆发以来巴勒斯坦以色列人的法律歧视的增加。研究的目的是解释这种增加的原因及其对以色列多数族裔关系的影响。 ；研究发现，自2000年9月以来，随着新立法的出台，对巴勒斯坦以色列人的法律歧视有所增加，该立法旨在使这一少数群体进一步边缘化。自2000年9月以来，以色列采取的法律政策是为国家安全着想的。以色列决策者和安全界认为巴勒斯坦少数民族对犹太人多数的安全构成直接威胁，因此，试图对以色列的巴勒斯坦少数民族施加政治和法律限制的政策是合理的。根据以色列政策制定者的假设，这项研究发现，是对巴勒斯坦少数群体的法律歧视的增加以及将其排除在以色列政体之外，这导致该少数群体对国家使用政治暴力的情况有所增加。依靠前景理论和相对剥夺理论，该研究开发了一个模型，该模型采用六个标准来表明在以色列案例研究中爆发内部暴力的可能性。研究结果表明，巴勒斯坦少数群体可能正在将其目前的法律地位与其先前的法律地位进行比较一是在奥斯陆和平进程中，少数派在国家内部的地位有所提高。以奥斯陆和平进程时期为参考点，导致少数族裔将其当前状况视为一种不公正的损失（处于法律地位），从而有可能利用对国家的政治暴力来获得这些可感知的损失。调查结果表明，随着外部以色列-巴勒斯坦冲突中暴力的加剧，存在一种周期性的模式，即先前存在的对巴勒斯坦和阿拉伯少数民族的恐惧和不信任感会导致他们的疏远和不满。歧视性立法很少导致对国家采取行动，反过来又增强了人们对威胁的认识并使歧视合法化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Olesker, Ronnie May.;

  • 作者单位

    Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University).;

  • 授予单位 Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University).;
  • 学科 International law.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 481 p.
  • 总页数 481
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号